Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (105)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tynes, T.
Right arrow Articles by Langmark, F.Øy.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tynes, T.
Right arrow Articles by Langmark, F.Øy.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 136, No. 1: 81-88
Copyright © 1992 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Incidence of Cancer in Norwegian Workers Potentially Exposed to Electromagnetic Fields

Tore Tynes, Aage Andersen and FrØydis Langmark

Cancer Registy of Norway, Institute of Epidemiological Cancer Research Olso, Norway

Reprint requests to Dr. Tore Tynes, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Epidemiological Cancer Research, Montebello, N-0310 Oslo, Norway.

The risk of cancer was investigated in a cohort of 37, 945 male Norwegian electrical workers for whom information on job description was collected from 1960 census data and linked to the 1970 census data. The standardized incidence ratio was calculated for all cancer sites in the overall cohort by comparison with national incidence rates for economically active men at the 1960 census. The standardized incidence ratios for cancers of the breast, pleura (mesothelioma), larynx, and bladder and for soft tissue sarcoma were elevated, while those for non-Hodgkins and Hodgkins lymphoma were lower. The standardized incidence ratio for leukemia for electrical workers with 10 or more economically active years was 1.41. The standardized incidence ratio for brain tumors in this subgroup of electrical workers was 1.41. These results from a large, national, population-based study at the Cancer Registry of Norway give support to previous findings of a possible association between electrical work and the risk of leukemia.

electromagnetic fields; incidence; leukemia; neoplasms; occupational exposure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. A. Brinton, D. A. Richesson, G. L. Gierach, J. V. Lacey Jr, Y. Park, A. R. Hollenbeck, and A. Schatzkin
Prospective Evaluation of Risk Factors for Male Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 15, 2008; 100(20): 1477 - 1481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
G. Berg, J. Spallek, J. Schuz, B. Schlehofer, E. Bohler, K. Schlaefer, I. Hettinger, K. Kunna-Grass, J. Wahrendorf, and M. Blettner
Occupational Exposure to Radio Frequency/Microwave Radiation and the Risk of Brain Tumors: Interphone Study Group, Germany
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2006; 164(6): 538 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
L. Nichols and T. Sorahan
Mortality of UK electricity generation and transmission workers, 1973-2002
Occup. Med., October 1, 2005; 55(7): 541 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
N Hakansson, C Stenlund, P Gustavsson, C Johansen, and B Floderus
Arc and resistance welding and tumours of the endocrine glands: a Swedish case-control study with focus on extremely low frequency magnetic fields
Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2005; 62(5): 304 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. R. Weiss, K. B. Moysich, and H. Swede
Epidemiology of Male Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 20 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
E V Willett, P A McKinney, N T Fear, R A Cartwright, and E Roman
Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and acute leukaemia: analysis of a case-control study
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2003; 60(8): 577 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. E. Charles, D. Loomis, C. M. Shy, B. Newman, R. Millikan, L. A. Nylander-French, and D. Couper
Electromagnetic Fields, Polychlorinated Biphenyls, and Prostate Cancer Mortality in Electric Utility Workers
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2003; 157(8): 683 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
P. J Villeneuve, D. A Agnew, K. C Johnson, and Y. Mao
Brain cancer and occupational exposure to magnetic fields among men: results from a Canadian population-based case-control study
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2002; 31(1): 210 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
F. Laden, L. M. Neas, P. E. Tolbert, M. D. Holmes, S. E. Hankinson, D. Spiegelman, F. E. Speizer, and D. J. Hunter
Electric Blanket Use and Breast Cancer in the Nurses' Health Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2000; 152(1): 41 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
I A. Ojajarvi, T. J Partanen, A. Ahlbom, P. Boffetta, T. Hakulinen, N. Jourenkova, T. P Kauppinen, M. Kogevinas, M. Porta, H. U Vainio, et al.
Occupational exposures and pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis
Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2000; 57(5): 316 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
L. I. Loberg, J. R. Gauger, J. L. Buthod, W. R. Engdahl, and D. L. McCormick
Gene expression in human breast epithelial cells exposed to 60 Hz magnetic fields
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 1999; 20(8): 1633 - 1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. K Verkasalo, E. Pukkala, J. Kaprio, K. V Heikkila, and M. Koskenvuo
Magnetic fields of high voltage power lines and risk of cancer in Finnish adults: nationwide cohort study
BMJ, October 26, 1996; 313(7064): 1047 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.