Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joffe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joffe, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 135, No. 5: 564-570
Copyright © 1992 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Validity of Exposure Data Derived from a Structured Questionnaire

Michael Joffe

From the Academic Department of Public Health, St. Mary's Hospital Medical School London, England

Reprint requests to Dr. Michael Joffe, Senior Lecturer in Public Health, Academic Department of Public Health, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, Norfolk Race, London W2 1PG, England

It is often convenient to obtain occupational exposure information directly from employees. However, there is little published evidence on the validity of such data. Information from a short, pre-coded, structured questionnaire, administered by nonexpert interviewers, was compared with information derived from management in five factories in the printing and plastics industries in England in 1986. Values of sensitivity ranged from 24% to 85% for eight different exposures, and specificity was at least 67% for seven of the eight agents. Those exposures which were described in chemically specific terms tended to have relatively higher specificities but lower sensitivities. Male workers' reports tended to have higher sensitivity but lower specificity compared with those of female workers. Workers who had been employed in the company for more than 10 years were no more accurate than their colleagues. Subjects who reported a phase of subfertility or at least one miscarriage did not have a higher proportion of false positives than the population as a whole, indicating an absence of reporting bias. Major improvements are highly desirable, especially to reduce underreporting of exposures. The use of workers' own names for agents may improve reporting.

environmental exposure; occupational exposure; questionnaires; validation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
P. A. McKinney, O. Y. Raji, M. van Tongeren, and R. G. Feltbower
The UK Childhood Cancer Study: maternal occupational exposures and childhood leukaemia and lymphoma
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2008; 132(2): 232 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M.-L. Lindbohm, P. Ylostalo, M. Sallmen, M.-L. Henriks-Eckerman, T. Nurminen, H. Forss, and H. Taskinen
Occupational exposure in dentistry and miscarriage
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2007; 64(2): 127 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D. C Glass and M. R Sim
The challenges of exposure assessment in health studies of Gulf War veterans
Phil Trans R Soc B, April 29, 2006; 361(1468): 627 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
G L Delclos, A A Arif, L Aday, A Carson, D Lai, C Lusk, T Stock, E Symanski, L W Whitehead, F G Benavides, et al.
Validation of an asthma questionnaire for use in healthcare workers.
Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2006; 63(3): 173 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
K Teschke, A F Olshan, J L Daniels, A J De Roos, C G Parks, M Schulz, T L Vaughan, and H Kromhout
Occupational exposure assessment in case-control studies: opportunities for improvement
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2002; 59(9): 575 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
P. S. Bakke, R. Hanoa, and A. Gulsvik
Relation of Occupational Exposure to Respiratory Symptoms and Asthma in a General Population Sample: Self-reported versus Interview-based Exposure Data
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2001; 154(5): 477 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. L. Daniels, A. F. Olshan, K. Teschke, I. Hertz-Picciotto, D. A. Savitz, and J. Blatt
Comparison of Assessment Methods for Pesticide Exposure in a Case-Control Interview Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2001; 153(12): 1227 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
L. Kaerlev, P. S. Teglbjaerg, S. Sabroe, H. A Kolstad, W. Ahrens, M. Eriksson, A. L. González, P. Guénel, L. Hardell, G. Launoy, et al.
Occupation and small bowel adenocarcinoma: a European case-control study
Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2000; 57(11): 760 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
X. Ou Shu, P. Stewart, W.-Q. Wen, D. Han, J. D. Potter, J. D. Buckley, E. Heineman, and L. L. Robison
Parental Occupational Exposure to Hydrocarbons and Risk of Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia in Offspring
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 1999; 8(9): 783 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
L. S. Newman
Occupational Illness
N. Engl. J. Med., October 26, 1995; 333(17): 1128 - 1134.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.