Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reif, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reif, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, C. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 135, No. 3: 234-239
Copyright © 1992 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Passive Smoking and Canine Lung Cancer Risk

John S. Reif1,, Kari Dunn2, Gregory K. Ogilvie3 and Cheryl K. Harris2

1Department of Environmental Health, Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO
2The Animal Diagnostic Clinic Dallas, TX
3Department of Cfinical Sciences, Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO

Reprint requests to Dr. John S. Reif, Department of Environmental Health, Cotege of Veterinary Medicine and Homedical Sciences, Cotorado State University, Fort Col-ins, CO 80523.

A case-control study was conducted to determine whether household exposure to environmental tobacco smoke is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer in pet dogs. Lung cancer cases and controls with other forms of cancer were obtained from two veterinary teaching hospitals during 1985–1987. Exposures assessed included the number of smokers in the household, the amount smoked, and the proportion of time spent indoors by the pet. A weak relation was found for exposure to a smoker in the home (odds ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval 0.7–3.7), after controlling for confounding in stratified analyses. Strong evidence for a further increase in risk associated with more than one smoker in the home was not found, nor was a significant trend observed for increasing number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day or an exposure index based on number of smokers in each household, packs smoked per day, and the proportion of time the dog spent within the home. However, skull shape appeared to exert effect modification; the risk was restricted to breeds with short and medium length noses (odds ratio = 2.4,95% confidence interval 0.7–7.8). Despite the inconclusive findings of the current study, epidemiologic studies in pet animals may add to our understanding of environmental tobacco smoke effects in human populations. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:234–9.

dogs; lung neoplasms; tobacco smoke pollution


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S M Milberger, R M Davis, and A L Holm
Pet owners' attitudes and behaviours related to smoking and second-hand smoke: a pilot study
Tob. Control, April 1, 2009; 18(2): 156 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. R. Bertone, L. A. Snyder, and A. S. Moore
Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Risk of Malignant Lymphoma in Pet Cats
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2002; 156(3): 268 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
P. N. Lee, J. S. Fry, and B. Forey
Revisiting the Association between Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Lung Cancer Risk: V. Overall Conclusions
Indoor and Built Environment, March 1, 2002; 11(2): 59 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
E. Nelson
The miseries of passive smoiong
Human and Experimental Toxicology, February 1, 2001; 20(2): 61 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D Cummins
Pets and passive smoking
BMJ, October 8, 1994; 309(6959): 960c - 960.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.