Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (80)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gridley, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fraumeni, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gridley, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fraumeni, J. F., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 135, No. 10: 1083-1092
Copyright © 1992 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Vitamin Supplement Use and Reduced Risk of Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer

Gloria Gridley1,, Joseph K. McLaughlin1, Gladys Block2, William J. Blot1, Maria Gluch1 and Joseph F. Fraumeni, Jr1

1National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Etiology, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program Bethesda, MD
2National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Bethesda, MD

Reprint requests to Ms. Gloria Gridley, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza North, Room 443, Bethesda, MD 20892

Use of vitamin and mineral supplements was assessed in a population-based case-control study of oral and pharyngeal cancer, conducted during 1984–1985 in four areas of the United States. There was no association with intake of multivitamin products, but users of supplements of individual vitamins, including vitamins A, B, C, and E, were at lower risk after controlling for the effects of tobacco, alcohol, and other risk factors for these cancers. After further adjustment for use of other supplements, vitamin E was the only supplement that remained associated with a significantly reduced cancer risk. The adjusted odds ratio of oral and pharyngeal cancer for "ever regularly used" vitamin E was 0.5 (95% confidence interval 0.4–0.6). To the authors' knowledge, this is the first epidemiologic study to show a reduced oral cancer risk with vitamin E use. Although it is not clear that the lower risk among consumers of vitamin E supplements is due to the vitamin per se, the findings are consistent with experimental evidence and should prompt further research on the role of vitamin E and other micronutrients as inhibitors of oral and pharyngeal cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 1083–92

mouth neoplasms; neoplasms; pharyngeal neoplasms; retrospective studies; risk factors; vitamin E; vitamins


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
I. Bairati, F. Meyer, M. Gelinas, A. Fortin, A. Nabid, F. Brochet, J.-P. Mercier, B. Tetu, F. Harel, B. Masse, et al.
A Randomized Trial of Antioxidant Vitamins to Prevent Second Primary Cancers in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 6, 2005; 97(7): 481 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
The HOPE and HOPE-TOO Trial Investigators
Effects of Long-term Vitamin E Supplementation on Cardiovascular Events and Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, March 16, 2005; 293(11): 1338 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. H. Conney
Enzyme Induction and Dietary Chemicals as Approaches to Cancer Chemoprevention: The Seventh DeWitt S. Goodman Lecture
Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 63(21): 7005 - 7031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
W. C. Willett
Diet and Cancer
Oncologist, October 1, 2000; 5(5): 393 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CROBMHome page
J. L. Schwartz
Biomarkers and Molecular Epidemiology and Chemoprevention of Oral Carcinogenesis
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 2000; 11(1): 92 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.