Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Psaty, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Psaty, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, E. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 134, No. 1: 96-106
Copyright © 1991 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Sampling Elderly in the Community: A Comparison of Commercial Telemarketing Lists and Random Digit Dialing Techniques for Assessing Health Behaviors and Health Status

Bruce M. Psaty1,2,3, Allen Cheadle3, Susan Curry3,4, Thomas McKenna5, Thomas D. Koepsell1,2,3, Thomas Wickizer3, Michael VonKorff3,4, Paula Diehr3,6, Edward B. Perrin3,6 and Edward H. Wagner3,4,

1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, WA
2 Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington Seattle, WA
3 Department of Health Services, University of Washington Seattle, WA
4 Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound Seattle, WA
5 Westat Inc. Rockville, MD
6 Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, WA

Reprint requests to Dr. Edward H. Wagner, Director, Center for Health Studies, Met2, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.

A study of health behaviors in four communities in the western United States in 1988 provided the opportunity to compare two methods of sampling elderly respondents for a telephone interview. The Polk telemarketing lists were used to identify 1,407 respondents aged 65 years and older in four communities, where 253 respondents in the same age group were also identified by the method of random digit dialing. Individuals identified from the Polk lists received a letter prior to the initial telephone contact. The overall response rate was 49.3% for random digit dialing and 57.3% for the Polk lists. On the average, the identification of one elderly respondent using the Polk lists required about 20–25% as much interviewer time per subject identified as was required by the random digit dialing method. The elderly identified by the Polk lists were significantly older than those identified by random digit dialing, and the proportions of the Polk sample who were married, white, or had an income of greater than $10,000 were slightly higher than those of the random digit dialing sample. Among 40 variables measuring various health behaviors, indicators of health status, and participation in health-related programs and classes, only three differed significantly between the two samples. The authors conclude that sampling from commercial telemarketing lists was an efficient method of identifying elderly respondents and that in these four communities, the estimates of health behaviors and health status were comparable with those obtained by random digit dialing techniques. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 96–106.

aged; health behavior; health education; health status; health surveys; sampling studies; telephone


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
W. McClellan, R. Speckman, L. McClure, V. Howard, R. C. Campbell, M. Cushman, P. Audhya, G. Howard, and D. G. Warnock
Prevalence and Characteristics of a Family History of End-Stage Renal Disease among Adults in the United States Population: Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Renal Cohort Study
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 1344 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.