Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatch, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kartzmer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hatch, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kartzmer, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 133, No. 8: 826-831
Copyright © 1991 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Proxy Respondents in Reproductive Research: A Comparison of Self- and Partner-reported Data

Maureen C. Hatch1,, Dawn Misra1, Geoffrey C. Kabat2 and Susan Kartzmer3

1Division of Epidemiology, Columbia University School of Public Health New York, NY.
2Division of Epidemiology, American Health Foundation New York, NY
3 Sergievsky Center, Columbia University New York, NY.

Reprint requests to Dr Maureen C Hatch, Division of Epidemiology, Columbia University School of Public Health, 600 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032

The quality of proxy reporting was assessed among 136 prenatal patients and their spouse/partners recruited from the obstetric services of a New Jersey hospital between 1985 and 1987. The concordance, sensitivity, and specificity of proxy reports about partners occupation, smoking, and drinking were examined in relation to self-reports. Overall, private patients provided better proxy data than did clinic patients, and women provided better data than did men. No consistent effects on the quality of proxy reports were found in relation to age, level of education, marital status, or length of cohabitation. Partners recent job titles appeared to be quite accurately reported, whereas partners smoking and drinking patterns were less well-reported. For alcohol use in particular, there was evidence of considerable misclassification resulting from proxy reports even when kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients suggested good agreement. Use of proxy respondents is unnecessary in reproductive studies and should be avoided when it may produce misleading results. Our data indicate that private prenatal patients and their partners can give reasonable proxy reports about job titles and smoking, but not about alcohol use. The high proportion of clinic patients who did not refer a partner (or whose partners could not be contacted) limits the generalizability of our results for this group and gives cause for concern about collecting proxy information from clinic populations. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133:826–31.

alcohol drinking; epidemiologic methods; occupations; questionnaires; reproduction; smoking


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Khawaja and M. Tewtel-Salem
Agreement between husband and wife reports of domestic violence: evidence from poor refugee communities in Lebanon
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 33(3): 526 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Khawaja and M. Tewtel-Salem
Agreement between husband and wife reports of domestic violence: evidence from poor refugee communities in Lebanon
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 33(3): 526 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.