Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samuels, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Breslow, N. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samuels, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Breslow, N. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 133, No. 11: 1191-1197
Copyright © 1991 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Power and Detectable Risk of Seven Tests for Standardized Mortality Ratios

Steven J. Samuels1,2,, James J. Beaumont1 and Norman E. Breslow3

1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Califor nia Davis, CA
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Davis, CA
3Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, WA

Reprint requests to Dr. Steven Sarnuels, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, ITEH, University of California. Davis, CA 95616.

Power and minimum detectable risk are calculated for seven one-sided tests of standardized mortality ratios with Poisson-distributed events. Each test contrasts the number of observed deaths (D) with the number expected (E). Three tests use exact Poisson probabilities: 1) the exact test, which computes a p value as the probability of equaling or exceeding the number of observed events; 2) the optimal randomized exact test which, although not used in practice, serves as a standard for the other statistics; and 3) the exact "mid-" procedure, which counts only one-half the probability of the observed event. The remaining four tests use normal approximations to the Poisson ("Z statistics"): 4)Formula) the Z statistic corrected for continuity, Formula a statistic based on a square root transformation, Formula; and 7) a statistic created by Byar, which, when D is greater than E, is Formula. Power differences among these procedures with one-sided {alpha} of 0.05, 0.025, and 0.01 are small as long as four or more events are expected. If fewer than four events are expected, the uncorrected Z has unacceptably high type I error. Simple approximations to the power and detectable risk of these tests are evaluated and prove satisfactory. Differences in minimum detectable risk, actual and approximated, are slight for E of 2.0 or more.

probability; risk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
J-B Ruidavets, S Paterniti, V Bongard, M Giroux, S Cassadou, and J Ferrieres
Triggering of acute coronary syndromes after a chemical plant explosion
Heart, February 1, 2006; 92(2): 257 - 258.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
P. Cabre, A. Signate, S. Olindo, H. Merle, D. Caparros-Lefebvre, O. Bera, and D. Smadja
Role of return migration in the emergence of multiple sclerosis in the French West Indies
Brain, December 1, 2005; 128(12): 2899 - 2910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
X. Mariette, D. Cazals-Hatem, J. Warszawki, F. Liote, N. Balandraud, and J. Sibilia
Lymphomas in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with methotrexate: a 3-year prospective study in France
Blood, May 13, 2002; 99(11): 3909 - 3915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.