American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 132, No. 6: 1185-1195
Copyright © 1990 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
research-article |
THE IMPACT OF DIETARY MEASUREMENT ERROR ON PLANNING SAMPLE SIZE REQUIRED IN A COHORT STUDY
1Biometry Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD
2Cancer Prevention Studies Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD
Reprint requests to Laurence S. Freedman, Biometry Branch, DCPC, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza North, Suite 344, Bethesda, MID 20892
Dietary measurement error has two consequences relevant to epidemiologic studies: first, a proportion of subjects are misclassified into the wrong groups, and second, the distribution of reported intakes is wider than the distribution of true intakes. While the first effect has been deatt with by several other authors, the second effect has not received as much attention. Using a simple errors-in-measurement model, the authors investigate the implications of measurement error for the distribution of fat intake. They then show how the inference of a more narrow distribution of true intakes affects the calculation of sample size for a cohort study. The authors give an example of the calculation for a cohort study investigating dietary fat and colorectal cancer. This shows that measurement error has a profound effect on sample size, requiring a six-to eightfold increase over the number required in the absence of error, If the correlation coefficient between reported and true intakes is 0.65. Reliable detection of a relative risk of 1.36 between a true intake of greater than 47.5% calories from fat and less than 25% calories from fat would require approximately one million subjects.
cohort studies; colorectal neoplasms; dietary fats
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. E Millen, A. F Subar, B. I Graubard, U. Peters, R. B Hayes, J. L Weissfeld, L. A Yokochi, R. G Ziegler, and for the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (P Fruit and vegetable intake and prevalence of colorectal adenoma in a cancer screening trial Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2007; 86(6): 1754 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. E. Millen, D. Midthune, F. E. Thompson, V. Kipnis, and A. F. Subar The National Cancer Institute Diet History Questionnaire: Validation of Pyramid Food Servings Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2006; 163(3): 279 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. S. Freedman, D. Midthune, R. J. Carroll, S. Krebs-Smith, A. F. Subar, R. P. Troiano, K. Dodd, A. Schatzkin, P. Ferrari, and V. Kipnis Adjustments to Improve the Estimation of Usual Dietary Intake Distributions in the Population J. Nutr., July 1, 2004; 134(7): 1836 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Devine The Impact of Ignoring Measurement Error when Estimating Sample Size for Epidemiologic Studies Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2003; 26(3): 315 - 339. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Kipnis, A. F. Subar, D. Midthune, L. S. Freedman, R. Ballard-Barbash, R. P. Troiano, S. Bingham, D. A. Schoeller, A. Schatzkin, and R. J. Carroll Structure of Dietary Measurement Error: Results of the OPEN Biomarker Study Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2003; 158(1): 14 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. F. Subar, F. E. Thompson, V. Kipnis, D. Midthune, P. Hurwitz, S. McNutt, A. McIntosh, and S. Rosenfeld Comparative Validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute Food Frequency Questionnaires : The Eating at America's Table Study Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2001; 154(12): 1089 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Schatzkin, A. F. Subar, F. E. Thompson, L. C. Harlan, J. Tangrea, A. R. Hollenbeck, P. E. Hurwitz, L. Coyle, N. Schussler, D. S. Michaud, et al. Design and Serendipity in Establishing a Large Cohort with Wide Dietary Intake Distributions : The National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2001; 154(12): 1119 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Espeland, S. Kumanyika, A. C. Wilson, D. M. Reboussin, L. Easter, M. Self, J. Robertson, W. M. Brown, and M. McFarlane Statistical Issues in Analyzing 24-Hour Dietary Recall and 24-Hour Urine Collection Data for Sodium and Potassium Intakes Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2001; 153(10): 996 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Kipnis, D. Midthune, L. S. Freedman, S. Bingham, A. Schatzkin, A. Subar, and R. J. Carroll Empirical Evidence of Correlated Biases in Dietary Assessment Instruments and Its Implications Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2001; 153(4): 394 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. R. Holford and C. Stack Study design for epidemiologic studies with measurement error Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 1995; 4(4): 339 - 358. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|