Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (47)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SILVERMAN, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by HOOVER, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SILVERMAN, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by HOOVER, R. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 132, No. 3: 453-461
Copyright © 1990 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

OCCUPATIONAL RISKS OF BLADDER CANCER AMONG WHITE WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES

DEBRA T. SILVERMAN1,, LYNN I. LEVIN2 and ROBERT N. HOOVER1

1Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, Division of Cancer Etiology, National Cancer Institute, NIH Bethesda, MD
2Department of Epidemiology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Washington, DC

Reprint requests to Dr. Debra Silverman, Biostatistics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza North, Room 415, Bethesda, MD 20892

The relation between occupation and bladder cancer in women was examined based on data collected during the National Bladder Cancer Study, a population-based, case-control study conducted in 10 areas of the United States. Occupational hazards among women have received little attention in previous bladder cancer studies, in part because most studies have included too few females to accurately estimate risks. In this large case-control study, 652 white female bladder cancer patients and 1,266 white female controls were interviewed to obtain lifetime occupational histories. Patterns of bladder cancer risk by occupation in women tended to be similar to those previously observed among men. Increased risk was apparent for women ever employed in metal working and fabrication occupations (relative risk (RR)=1.5; 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.9–2.6). Within this summary occupation category, punch and stamping press operatives had a significant trend in risk with increasing duration of employment (p=0.012); the RR for women employed 5 years or more was 5.6 (95% Cl 1.4–26.4). The authors also observed an increased risk for women employed as chemical processing workers (RR=2.1; 95% Cl 0.9–5.1=with a significant, positive trend in risk with increasing duration of employment (p=0.042). In contrast, a decreased risk was apparent for female textile workers (RR=0.6; 95% Cl 0.3–1.1) with a significant, negative trend in risk with increasing duration of employment (p=0.031); the relative risk for textile workers employed 10 years or more was 0.4. The authors estimate that 11% of bladder cancer diagnosed among white women in the United States is attributable to occupational exposures; this percentage is considerably lower than the 21–25% previously reported for white men in this study.

bladder neoplasms; occupations; women


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
B. Pesch, J. Haerting, U. Ranft, A. Klimpel, B. Oelschlagel, W. Schill, and t. MURC Study Group
Occupational risk factors for urothelial carcinoma: agent-specific results from a case-control study in Germany
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2000; 29(2): 238 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
I. Rosenwaike
Surname Analysis as a Means of Estimating Minority Elderly: An Application Using Asian Surnames
Research on Aging, June 1, 1994; 16(2): 212 - 227.
[Abstract]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.