Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (82)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRODERICK, A.
Right arrow Articles by WENZEL, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BRODERICK, A.
Right arrow Articles by WENZEL, R. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 131, No. 4: 734-742
Copyright © 1990 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS: VALIDATION OF SURVEILLANCE AND COMPUTER MODELING TO IDENTIFY PAT AT RISK

ANN BRODERICK1, MOTOMI MORI2, MARY D. NETTLEMAN1, STREPHEN A. STREED3 and RICHARD P. WENZEL1,3,

1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine Iowa City, IA
2Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine Iowa City, IA
3Program of Hospital Epidennology, University Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City, IA

Reprint requests to Dr. Richard P. Wenzel, Division of General Medicine, Clinical Epiderniolo and Health Services Research, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

To estimate the accuracy of routine hospital-wide surveillance for nosocomial infection, the authors performed a validation study at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, a 900-bed tertiary care Institution, by daily concurrent surveys of all patients' charts. The study extended over a 10-month period from January to October 1987. The sensitivity and specificity of the reported data were 80.7% (95% confidence interval (Cl) 72.2–89.2) and 97.5% (95% Cl 96.4–98.5), respectively. The predictive values of positive or negative reports of an infection were 75.3% (95% Cl 66.3–84.2) and 98.1% (95% Cl 97.3–99.1), respectively. In a separate analysis, the data entry system was reviewed for eight descriptive variables among all patients with infections (n=443) identified over a 2-month period. The data entry was found to be 94–99% accurate. To improve the efficiency of current surveillance, the authors used data gathered during the study to develop a computer model for the Identification of patients with a high probability of having a nosocomial Infection. The use of stepwise logistic regres sion identified five variables which independently predicted infection: age of the patient (years), days of antibiotics, days of hospitalization, and the number of days on which urine and/or wound cultures were obtained. Optimal sensitivity and specificity (8 1.6% and 72.5%, respectively) were found when the model examined patients with an 8% or higher a priori probability of infection; this figure corresponded to a review of 33% of the patients' charts. Increasing the a priori probability would progressively increase specificity and reduce both sensitivity and the number of charts needed for review. If it is prospectively validated, the model may provide a more efficient mechanism by which to conduct hospital- wide surveillance.

computer simulation; cross infection; patient identification systems; risk; sensitivity and specificity (epidemiology)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. M. Perl, J. J. Cullen, R. P. Wenzel, M. B. Zimmerman, M. A. Pfaller, D. Sheppard, J. Twombley, P. P. French, L. A. Herwaldt, and the Mupirocin and the Risk of Staphylococcus aureu
Intranasal Mupirocin to Prevent Postoperative Staphylococcus aureus Infections
N. Engl. J. Med., June 13, 2002; 346(24): 1871 - 1877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
Y. F. Berrouane, L. A. Herwaldt, and M. A. Pfaller
Trends in Antifungal Use and Epidemiology of Nosocomial Yeast Infections in a University Hospital
J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 1999; 37(3): 531 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. Pittet and R. P. Wenzel
Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections: Secular Trends in Rates, Mortality, and Contribution to Total Hospital Deaths
Arch Intern Med, June 12, 1995; 155(11): 1177 - 1184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. S. Rangel-Frausto, D. Pittet, M. Costigan, T. Hwang, C. S. Davis, and R. P. Wenzel
The Natural History of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) A Prospective Study
JAMA, January 11, 1995; 273(2): 117 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. Pittet, D. Tarara, and R. P. Wenzel
Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection in Critically III Patients: Excess Length of Stay, Extra Costs, and Attributable Mortality
JAMA, May 25, 1994; 271(20): 1598 - 1601.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. Ena, R. W. Dick, R. N. Jones, and R. P. Wenzel
The Epidemiology of Intravenous Vancomycin Usage in a University Hospital: A 10-Year Study
JAMA, February 3, 1993; 269(5): 598 - 602.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. F. Widmer, M. Nettleman, K. Flint, and R. P. Wenzel
The Clinical Impact of Culturing Central Venous Catheters: A Prospective Study
Arch Intern Med, June 1, 1992; 152(6): 1299 - 1302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. N. Doebbeling and R. P. Wenzel
The Direct Costs of Universal Precautions in a Teaching Hospital
JAMA, October 24, 1990; 264(16): 2083 - 2087.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.