Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WRENSCH, M.
Right arrow Articles by NEUTRA, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WRENSCH, M.
Right arrow Articles by NEUTRA, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 131, No. 2: 283-300
Copyright © 1990 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN WOMEN POTENTIALLY EXPOSED TO SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED DRINKING WATER IN SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA

MARGARET WRENSCH1,2,, SHANNA SWAN1, JANE LIPSCOMB1, DAVID EPSTEIN1, LAURA FENSTER1, KATHLEEN CLAXTON1, PETER J. MURPHY3, DENNIS SHUSTERMAN4 and RAYMOND NEUTRA1

1Epidemiological Studies Section, California Department of Health Services Berkeley, CA
2Department of Epidemiology and International Health, University of California San Francisco, CA
3 53 Rolling Ridge Road, Amherst, MA
4Hazard Evaluation Section, California Department of Health Services Berkeley, CA

Reprint requests to Dr. Margaret Wrensch, Department of Epidemiology and International Health, Box 0560, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0560

During 1980–1981, solvents leaked from an underground storage tank of a semiconductor firm in southern Santa Clara County, California, contaminating local drinking water. The contaminated well was closed in December 1981. An epidemiologic study conducted in 1983 confirmed statistically significant excesses of adverse pregnancy outcomes In an exposed community compared with an unexposed community, but could not establish a causal connection between the leak and the adverse outcomes. This study expanded the first study adverse pregnancy outcomes occurring in 1980–1985 were studied in two con, munfties exposed to the contaminated drinking water and In two demographically comparable but unexposed communities. The period 1980–1981 was the time period in which the well was considered to have been contaminated and 1982–1985 was considered the postcontaminatlon time period. Both exposed and unexposed communities were considered unexposed during the latter period (1982–1985). Out of 10,055 households surveyed, interviews were conducted with 1,105 women who reported one or more eligible pregnancies. Miscarriages and birth defects were validated by medical record review or physician reports. Although the authors again observed statistically significant excesses of spon taneous abortions and birth defects in the originally studied exposed area in 1980–1981, they observed deficits of these outcomes in the second exposed study area. Adjustment for potential confounders did not alter these findings. Analyses of pregnancy outcomes during 1981 in relation to exposure estimates based on hydrogeologic modeling of water and contaminant distribution within the exposed areas also indicated that the leak was not likely to have caused the observed excesses of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the originally studied area.

abnormalities; abortion; hydrocarbons, chlorinated; pregnancy; water pollution, chemical


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.