Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LANGHOLZ, B.
Right arrow Articles by THOMAS, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LANGHOLZ, B.
Right arrow Articles by THOMAS, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 131, No. 1: 169-176
Copyright © 1990 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

NESTED CASE-CONTROL AND CASE-COHORT METHODS OF SAMPLING FROM A COHORT: A CRITICAL COMPARISON1

BRYAN LANGHOLZ and DUNCAN C. THOMAS

Reprint requests to Dr. Langholz

The recently developed case-cohort method of sampling from a cohort is compared with the nested case-control method. Corrected asymptotic relative efficiency results show that the case-cohort design for single "disease" outcomes offers less improvement for intervention trials for which there is no random censoring than originally suggested. Furthermore, simulation results indicate that if there is moderate random censoring or staggered entry, the case-cohort method can do substantially worse than the nested case-control method.

biometry; epidemiologic methods; follow-up studies; research design; statistics


1From the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, School of Medicine, 2025 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033-9987.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BiometrikaHome page
S. Kang and J. Cai
Marginal hazards model for case-cohort studies with multiple disease outcomes
Biometrika, December 1, 2009; 96(4): 887 - 901.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. M. Ho, T. M. Maddox, L. Wang, S. D. Fihn, R. L. Jesse, E. D. Peterson, and J. S. Rumsfeld
Risk of Adverse Outcomes Associated With Concomitant Use of Clopidogrel and Proton Pump Inhibitors Following Acute Coronary Syndrome
JAMA, March 4, 2009; 301(9): 937 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
D. M. Steinberg, J. Fine, and R. Chappell
Sample size for positive and negative predictive value in diagnostic research using case-control designs
Biostat., January 1, 2009; 10(1): 94 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. L. Rock, S. W. Flatt, G. A. Laughlin, E. B. Gold, C. A. Thomson, L. Natarajan, L. A. Jones, B. J. Caan, M. L. Stefanick, R. A. Hajek, et al.
Reproductive Steroid Hormones and Recurrence-Free Survival in Women with a History of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 614 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
I H M Friesema, P J Zwietering, M Y Veenstra, J A Knottnerus, H F L Garretsen, and P H H M Lemmens
Alcohol intake and cardiovascular disease and mortality: the role of pre-existing disease
J Epidemiol Community Health, May 1, 2007; 61(5): 441 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. G. Rundle, P. Vineis, and H. Ahsan
Design Options for Molecular Epidemiology Research within Cohort Studies
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2005; 14(8): 1899 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. A. Smith-Warner, D. Spiegelman, S.-S. Yaun, H.-O. Adami, W. L. Beeson, P. A. van den Brandt, A. R. Folsom, G. E. Fraser, J. L. Freudenheim, R. A. Goldbohm, et al.
Intake of Fruits and Vegetables and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Cohort Studies
JAMA, February 14, 2001; 285(6): 769 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
L. P. Zhao, C. Aragaki, L. Hsu, J. Potter, R. Elston, K. E. Malone, J. R. Daling, and R. Prentice
Integrated Designs for Gene Discovery and Characterization
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, December 1, 1999; 1999(26): 71 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. J. Hunter, D. Spiegelman, H.-O. Adami, L. Beeson, P. A. van den Brandt, A. R. Folsom, G. E. Fraser, R. A. Goldbohm, S. Graham, G. R. Howe, et al.
Cohort Studies of Fat Intake and the Risk of Breast Cancer -- A Pooled Analysis
N. Engl. J. Med., February 8, 1996; 334(6): 356 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
S. Wacholder
Design issues in case-control studies
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 1995; 4(4): 293 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.