Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (100)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARKS, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by MUELLER, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARKS, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by MUELLER, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 130, No. 3: 578-587
Copyright © 1989 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

THE SECOND NATIONAL HEALTH AND NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY 1976%1980

GEOFFREY C. MARKS1, JEAN-PIERRE HABICHT1, and WILLIAM H. MUELLER2

1Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University Ithaca, NY.
2School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, TX.

Reprint requests to Dr. Jean-Pierre Habicht, Division of Nutritional Scienw, Savage Hall, Cornell University, Ithaar, NY 14853

The component8 of reliabiitty for eight anthropometric measures were studied in 95 male and 134 female subjects from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II). The contributions to unreliability variance (Sr2) that occur as a resutt of measuring errors (Sp2 imprecidon variance) and of irttrasubject fluctuations in a measurement due to physiologic factors (Sd2, umdependabiltty) were estimated (Sr2 = Sp2 + Sd2). Unreiiabiiity was then related to the between-subject variance (s2 to estimate the reliability (R = 1 – (Sr2s2)) of the measurement Four of the anthropometric measurements (weight, height, sitting height, and arm circumference) had reliabilities in excess of R = 0.97. in the first three of these, measurement imprecision made up two thirds or lesa of unreliability, and undependability (Sd2) was stable by two weeks. Lesser but still acceptable reliabilttles were obtained for triceps and subscapular skinfolds, bitrochanteric breadth, and elbow breadth (R = 0.81–0.95). For these variables imprecision (Sp2) was the major source of error. Furthermore, the unreiiability (Sr2) between observers was twice as high or more than the unreliability Within observers for these variables, evidence that imprecision (Sp2) is the single most important source of unreliabiltty in these anthropometric measurements. Unreliability standard deviations of skinfdds increased in a linear manner wtth skinfold thickness corresponding to an unreliability coefficient of variation of 13–19 per cent None of the other measurements showed such scale effects. Analyses of the kind suggested will help epidemiologists decide whether reliability can be increased by improving precision, and whether there is a need to improve reliabiitty in the first place. Reliabiltty appears to be adequate for all anthropometry in the NHANES II.

anthropomeby; epidemiologic methods; health surveys; nutrition surveys


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
U Fiocco, F Ferro, M Vezzu, L Cozzi, C Checchetto, P Sfriso, C Botsios, L Ciprian, G Armellin, R Nardacchione, et al.
Rheumatoid and psoriatic knee synovitis: clinical, grey scale, and power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the response to etanercept
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2005; 64(6): 899 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P.-H. Lin, M. A Proschan, G. A Bray, C. P Fernandez, K. Hoben, M. Most-Windhauser, N. Karanja, and E. Obarzanek
Estimation of energy requirements in a controlled feeding trial
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2003; 77(3): 639 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D. Edelman, M. K. Olsen, T. K. Dudley, A. C. Harris, and E. Z. Oddone
Impact of Diabetes Screening on Quality of Life
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2002; 25(6): 1022 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. E Arifeen, R. E Black, L. E Caulfield, G. Antelman, A. H Baqui, Q. Nahar, S. Alamgir, and H. Mahmud
Infant growth patterns in the slums of Dhaka in relation to birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation, and prematurity
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2000; 72(4): 1010 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. L. Hediger, M. D. Overpeck, A. McGlynn, R. J. Kuczmarski, K. R. Maurer, and W. W. Davis
Growth and Fatness at Three to Six Years of Age of Children Born Small- or Large-for-Gestational Age
Pediatrics, September 1, 1999; 104 (3): e33 - e33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. S Morris, M. T Ruel, R. J Cohen, K. G Dewey, B. de la Briere, and M. N Hassan
Precision, accuracy, and reliability of hemoglobin assessment with use of capillary blood
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 1999; 69(6): 1243 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. L. Ogden, R. P. Troiano, R. R. Briefel, R. J. Kuczmarski, K. M. Flegal, and C. L. Johnson
Prevalence of Overweight Among Preschool Children in the United States, 1971 Through 1994
Pediatrics, April 1, 1997; 99(4): e1 - e1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. Shen, J.-P. Habicht, and Y. Chang
Effect of Economic Reforms on Child Growth in Urban and Rural Areas of China
N. Engl. J. Med., August 8, 1996; 335(6): 400 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.