Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (100)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRISSON, J.
Right arrow Articles by MEYER, F.çO.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BRISSON, J.
Right arrow Articles by MEYER, F.çO.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 130, No. 1: 14-24
Copyright © 1989 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

DIET, MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF BREAST TISSUE, AND BREAST CANCER RISK

JACQUES BRISSON1, RENE VERREAULT1, ALAN S. MORRISON2, SONIA TENNINA1 and FRANçOIS MEYER1

1Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Quebec Quebec, Canada
2Department of Community Health, Brown University Providence, RI.

This case-control study was designed to reevaluate the association of the morphology of breast tissue seen on mammograms with breast cancer risk and to assess the relation of diet, especially intake of fat and vitamin A, to the high-risk mammographic images. The cases included 290 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who were first treated in Quebec in 1982-1984. The controls included 645 women who participated in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Risk of breast cancer was higher among women with the P2 or DY parenchymal pattern (relative risk (RR) = 3.7, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 2.0-7.0) than it was among those with the N1 pattern. Moreover, risk increased regularly with the extent of nodular and homogeneous densities on the mammo-gram. Relative risk was 5.5 (95% Cl 2.3-13.2) for women in whom 60% or more of the volume of the breast showed either nodular or homogeneous densities compared with women without such densities. Among controls, increase in energy-adjusted saturated fat intake was associated with an increase in extent of high-risk mammographic features. Energy-adjusted polyunsaturated fat or cholesterol intake did not, however, appear to influence the morphology of breast tissue seen on the mammogram. Increasing carotenoid and fiber intakes were associated with a reduction of the extent of densities on the mammogram, but retinol intake seemed to have little or no effect on mammographic features. These data suggest that elevation in saturated fat intake and reduction in carotenoid and fiber intakes may be related to an increase in breast cancer risk through effects of these nutrients on breast tissue morphology.

breast neoplasms; carotenoids; diet; dietary fiber; fats; mammography; vitamin A


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Ding, R. Warren, I. Warsi, N. Day, D. Thompson, M. Brady, C. Tromans, R. Highnam, and D. Easton
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Using Standard Mammogram Form to Predict Breast Cancer Risk: Case-Control Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1074 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
R. J Santen, N. F Boyd, R. T Chlebowski, S. Cummings, J. Cuzick, M. Dowsett, D. Easton, J. F Forbes, T. Key, S. E Hankinson, et al.
Critical assessment of new risk factors for breast cancer: considerations for development of an improved risk prediction model
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 169 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
V. A. McCormack and I. dos Santos Silva
Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1159 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. Mitchell, A. C. Antoniou, R. Warren, S. Peock, J. Brown, R. Davies, J. Mattison, M. Cook, I. Warsi, D. G. Evans, et al.
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1866 - 1872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Nagata, T. Matsubara, H. Fujita, Y. Nagao, C. Shibuya, Y. Kashiki, and H. Shimizu
Associations of Mammographic Density with Dietary Factors in Japanese Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2005; 14(12): 2877 - 2880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Berube, C. Diorio, B. Masse, N. Hebert-Croteau, C. Byrne, G. Cote, M. Pollak, M. Yaffe, and J. Brisson
Vitamin D and Calcium Intakes from Food or Supplements and Mammographic Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2005; 14(7): 1653 - 1659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Heng, F. Gao, R. Jong, E. Fishell, M. Yaffe, L. Martin, T. Li, J. Stone, L. Sun, J. Hopper, et al.
Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Associated with Mammographic Features in Singaporean Chinese Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2004; 13(11): 1751 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg
Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Brisson, C. Diorio, and B. Masse
Wolfe's Parenchymal Pattern and Percentage of the Breast with Mammographic Densities: Redundant or Complementary Classifications?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2003; 12(8): 728 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Stone, A. Gunasekara, L. J. Martin, M. Yaffe, S. Minkin, and N. F. Boyd
The Detection of Change in Mammographic Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2003; 12(7): 625 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
N. F. Boyd, G. S. Dite, J. Stone, A. Gunasekara, D. R. English, M. R.E. McCredie, G. G. Giles, D. Tritchler, A. Chiarelli, M. J. Yaffe, et al.
Heritability of Mammographic Density, a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., September 19, 2002; 347(12): 886 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. W. Singletary and S. M. Gapstur
Alcohol and Breast Cancer: Review of Epidemiologic and Experimental Evidence and Potential Mechanisms
JAMA, November 7, 2001; 286(17): 2143 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Freedman, J. S. Martin, J. O'Gorman, S. Eckert, M. E. Lippman, S.-C. B. Lo, E. L. Walls, and J. Zeng
Digitized Mammography: a Clinical Trial of Postmenopausal Women Randomly Assigned to Receive Raloxifene, Estrogen, or Placebo
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 3, 2001; 93(1): 51 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Brisson, B. Brisson, G. Coté, E. Maunsell, S. Bérubé, and J. Robert
Tamoxifen and Mammographic Breast Densities
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2000; 9(9): 911 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, L. H. Kushi, J. R. Cerhan, C. C. Kuni, and T. A. Sellers
Association of Diet and Mammographic Breast Density in the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Cohort
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2000; 9(2): 151 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.