Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (99)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WERLER, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by HOLMES, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WERLER, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by HOLMES, L. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 129, No. 2: 415-421
Copyright © 1989 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

REPORTING ACCURACY AMONG MOTHERS OF MALFORMED AND NONMALFORMIED INFANTS

MARTHA M. WERLER1 2, BARBARA R. POBER1, KATHRYN NELSON1 and LEWIS B. HOLMES1,

1Embryology-Teratology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA

Reprint requests to Dr. Lewis B. Holmes, Embryology-Teratology Unit, Warren Building 802, Massa chusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114

The potential for recall bias in case-control studies is a common concern. The authors assessed whether recall bias was present in exposure information reported at postpartum interview by mothers of malformed and nonmalformed infants who delivered at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, during 1984. Accuracy of exposure reporting was measured by comparing interview data with exposure Information documented during pregnancy in obstetric records. The authors' measure of recall bias, relative sensitivity (RS), is the ratio of exposure- reporting accuracy for mothers of malformed infants to that of mothers of nonmalformed infants. Relative sensitivity estimates that are greater than 1.0 indicate that mothers of malformed infants are more accurate reporters than mothers of nonmalformed infants. Relative sensitivity was estimated for eight exposure factors: antibiotic or antifungal drug use (RS=1.2), urinary tract or yeast infection (RS=2.7), history of infertilIty (RS=1.4), use of birth control after conception (RS=7.6), elective abortion history (RS=1.1), any over-the-counter drug use (RS=1.0), spotting or bleeding (RS=1.2), and nausea or vomiting (RS=0.8). These data suggest the presence of recall bias for some exposure factors. The authors advise the use of malformed controls to reduce potential recall bias in case-control studies of selected malformations and many etiologic factors

abnormalities; research design


2Present address: Slone Epidemiology Unit, School of Public Health, Boston University School of Medicine, Brookline, MA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. R. Caton, E. M. Bell, C. M. Druschel, M. M. Werler, A. E. Lin, M. L. Browne, L.-A. McNutt, P. A. Romitti, A. A. Mitchell, R. S. Olney, et al.
Antihypertensive Medication Use During Pregnancy and the Risk of Cardiovascular Malformations
Hypertension, July 1, 2009; 54(1): 63 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
P. A. McKinney, O. Y. Raji, M. van Tongeren, and R. G. Feltbower
The UK Childhood Cancer Study: maternal occupational exposures and childhood leukaemia and lymphoma
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2008; 132(2): 232 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. S. Draper, J. Rankin, A. M. Tonks, K. R. Abrams, D. J. Field, M. Clarke, and J. J. Kurinczuk
Recreational Drug Use: A Major Risk Factor for Gastroschisis?
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2008; 167(4): 485 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. L. Carmichael, W. Yang, A. Herring, B. Abrams, and G. M. Shaw
Maternal Food Insecurity Is Associated with Increased Risk of Certain Birth Defects
J. Nutr., September 1, 2007; 137(9): 2087 - 2092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. N. Cook, A. F. Olshan, H. A. Guess, D. A. Savitz, C. Poole, J. Blatt, M. L. Bondy, and B. H. Pollock
Maternal Medication Use and Neuroblastoma in Offspring
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2004; 159(8): 721 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. Infante-Rivard and L. Jacques
Empirical Study of Parental Recall Bias
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2000; 152(5): 480 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. C. McCormick and J. Brooks-Gunn
Concurrent Child Health Status and Maternal Recall of Events in Infancy
Pediatrics, November 1, 1999; 104(5): 1176 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. M. Norris, B. Beaty, G. Klingensmith, L. Yu, M. Hoffman, H. P. Chase, H. A. Erlich, R. F. Hamman, G. S. Eisenbarth, and M. Rewers
Lack of Association Between Early Exposure to Cow's Milk Protein and {beta}-Cell Autoimmunity: Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY)
JAMA, August 28, 1996; 276(8): 609 - 614.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
S. Wacholder
Design issues in case-control studies
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 1995; 4(4): 293 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. F. Chavez, J. Mulinare, and J. F. Cordero
Maternal Cocaine Use During Early Pregnancy as a Risk Factor for Congenital Urogenital Anomalies
JAMA, August 11, 1989; 262(6): 795 - 798.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.