Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SANDLER, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by SHORE, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SANDLER, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by SHORE, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 129, No. 2: 380-387
Copyright © 1989 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PAST HOUSEHOLD EXPOSURE TO TOBACCO SMOKE

DALE P. SANDLER1,, KNUD J. HELSING2, GEORGE W. COMSTOCK2 and DAVID L. SHORE1

1Epidemiology Branch, Division of Biometry and Risk Assessment, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park NC
2Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health Baltimore, MD

Reprint requests to Dr. Dale P. Sandler, Epidemiology Branch, MD A3-02, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

With data that were obtained in a private census in Washington County, Maryland, in 1963, the prevalence of household exposure to tobacco smoke was determined, and factors associated with passive smoke exposure were identified among 48,342 white adults. In 1963, 52% of men and 72% of women were exposed to smoke from others at home. Smokers of both sexes were more likely to live with other smokers than were nonsmokers. However, 30% of men who never smoked and 64% of women who never smoked lived with smokers. Marriage was a primary determinant of exposure for women but not for men, with 75% of married women who did not smoke exposed but only 38% of unmarried women who did not smoke exposed. Conversely, among men who did not smoke, exposure was more common among those who were not married than among those who were married. After control for other factors associated with exposure, exposure prevalence increased with years of school among men who did not smoke but decreased with years of school among women who did not smoke. Exposure prevalence also varied slightly with housing quality and location of residence. Smoking by spouse was an accurate reflection of household exposure for women but not for men; 88% of the exposure among women who did not smoke was contributed by the spouse, whereas only 62% of exposure among men who did not smoke was from the spouse

questionnaires; smoking; passive


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nicotine Tob ResHome page
R. Edwards
Spousal smoking as an indicator of total secondhand smoke exposure
Nicotine Tob Res, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 606 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
Honors and Awards * Bibliography of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2008; 168(7): 845 - 854.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. A. Venners, X. Wang, C. Chen, L. Wang, D. Chen, W. Guang, A. Huang, L. Ryan, J. O'Connor, B. Lasley, et al.
Paternal Smoking and Pregnancy Loss: A Prospective Study Using a Biomarker of Pregnancy
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2004; 159(10): 993 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
G. Whitlock, S. MacMahon, S. Vander Hoorn, P. Davis, R. Jackson, and R. Norton
Association of environmental tobacco smoke exposure with socioeconomic status in a population of 7725 New Zealanders
Tob. Control, September 1, 1998; 7(3): 276 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.