Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (104)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NEGRI, E.
Right arrow Articles by DEL TURCO, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NEGRI, E.
Right arrow Articles by DEL TURCO, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 128, No. 6: 1207-1215
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

RISK FACTORS FOR BREAST CANCER: POOLED RESULTS FROM THREE ITALIAN CASE-CONTROL STUDIES

EVA NEGRI1,2, CARLO LA VECCHIA1,3, PAOLO BRUZZI4, GABRIELLA DARDANONI5, ADRIANO DECARLI6, DOMENICO PALLI7, FABIO PARAZZINI1 and MARCO ROSSELLI DEL TURCO7

1"Mario Negri" Institute for Pharmacological Research Milan, Italy
2Inter-University Consortium of Lombardy for Automatic Data Processing (CILEA) Segrate, Milan, Italy
3Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland
4National Cancer Institute Genoa, Italy
5Institute of Hygiene, University of Palermo Palermo, Italy
6Institute of Medical Statistics, University of Milan, National Cancer Institute Milan, Italy and Institute of Statistics, University of Trento Trento, Italy.
7Oncological Prevention Centre (CSPO) USL10/E, Florence, Italy

Negri, E. ("Mario Negri" Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via Eritrea, 62, 20157 Milan, Italy), C. La Vecchia, P. Bruzzi, G. Dardanoni, A. Decarli, D. Palli, F. Parazzini, and M. Rosselli del Turco. Risk factors for breast cancer pooled results from three Italian case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128:1207–15.

The role of menstrual and reproductive factors, family history, and body weight in the epidemiology of breast cancer has been reassessed in a meta-analysis of three large case-control studies of breast cancer from several Italian regions, for a total data set of 4,072 cases and 4,099 controls. Multiple logistic regression equations were used to obtain relative risks adjusted for study, center, age, and various combinations of risk factors considered. Relative to women with men-arche at age 15 or over, those with earlier menarche had a 20–30% higher breast cancer risk. However, there was no tendency for the risk to increase with lower age at menarche, and the association with menarche was stronger at younger age. The risk of breast cancer was directly related to age at menopause (relative risk (RR)=0.7 for <45 years vs. >50 years), age at first live birth (RR =1.8 for >28 years vs. <22 years), and family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives (RR=2.0). The effect of these factors was similar in various age strata. After allowance for age at first live birth, the risk of breast cancer did not differ among women with one to four live births, but it was significantly below unity (RR=0.6) for those with five or more live births. Furthermore, there was a clear modifying effect of age at diagnosis on parity-related risk, since parous women had elevated breast cancer risk below age 35 and reduced risk above age 40. The risk of breast cancer was higher in overweight women; this positive association, however, was confined to postmenopausal subjects (RR=1.6 for obese women vs. leaner women). In terms of the multistage theory of carcinogenesis, the observation that the relative risk for family history and age at first live birth are of similar magnitude in subsequent age groups would indicate that the effect of these factors is on one of the earlier stages of the process; the decreasing association with advancing age for menarche would suggest the existence of some short-term (hormonal) correlate of early menarche; and the complex pattern of risk for parity is consistent with a possible differential action of this factor (or its hormonal correlates) on breast carcinogenesis, in terms of accelerated promotion but delayed initiation.

body weight; breast neoplasms; menarche; menopause; parity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. F. Anderson, P. S. Rosenberg, I. Menashe, A. Mitani, and R. M. Pfeiffer
Age-Related Crossover in Breast Cancer Incidence Rates Between Black and White Ethnic Groups
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 17, 2008; 100(24): 1804 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Chen, M. G. Kibriya, F. Jasmine, R. M. Santella, R. T. Senie, and H. Ahsan
Do Placental Genes Affect Maternal Breast Cancer? Association between Offspring's CGB5 and CSH1 Gene Variants and Maternal Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 68(23): 9729 - 9734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
M. P. Cleary, S. C. Juneja, F. C. Phillips, X. Hu, J. P. Grande, and N. J. Maihle
Leptin Receptor-Deficient MMTV-TGF-{alpha}/LeprdbLeprdb Female Mice Do Not Develop Oncogene-Induced Mammary Tumors
Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2004; 229(2): 182 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. R. Palmer, L. A. Wise, N. J. Horton, L. L. Adams-Campbell, and L. Rosenberg
Dual Effect of Parity on Breast Cancer Risk in African-American Women
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 19, 2003; 95(6): 478 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
H. Becher, S. Schmidt, and J. Chang-Claude
Reproductive factors and familial predisposition for breast cancer by age 50 years. A case-control-family study for assessing main effects and possible gene-environment interaction
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2003; 32(1): 38 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. A. Hunt and E. A. Sickles
Effect of Obesity on Screening Mammography: Outcomes Analysis of 88,346 Consecutive Examinations
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1251 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
N Andrieu, T Prevost, T. Rohan, E Luporsi, M. Le, M Gerber, D. Zaridze, Y Lifanova, R Renaud, H. Lee, et al.
Variation in the interaction between familial and reproductive factors on the risk of breast cancer according to age, menopausal status, and degree of familiality
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2000; 29(2): 214 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Z. Huang, S. E. Hankinson, G. A. Colditz, M. J. Stampfer, D. J. Hunter, J. E. Manson, C. H. Hennekens, B. Rosner, F. E. Speizer, and W. C. Willett
Dual Effects of Weight and Weight Gain on Breast Cancer Risk
JAMA, November 5, 1997; 278(17): 1407 - 1411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. A. Cauley, F. L. Lucas, L. H. Kuller, M. T. Vogt, W. S. Browner, and S. R. Cummings
Bone Mineral Density and Risk of Breast Cancer in Older Women: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures
JAMA, November 6, 1996; 276(17): 1404 - 1408.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Lambe, C.-c. Hsieh, D. Trichopoulos, A. Ekbom, M. Pavia, and H.-O. Adami
Transient Increase in the Risk of Breast Cancer after Giving Birth
N. Engl. J. Med., July 7, 1994; 331(1): 5 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
M. Diener-West, B. S. Hawkins, J. A. Markowitz, and A. P. Schachat
A Review of Mortality From Choroidal Melanoma: II. A Meta-Analysis of 5-Year Mortality Rates Following Enucleation, 1966 Through 1988
Arch Ophthalmol, February 1, 1992; 110(2): 245 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.