Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WU, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by JUNG, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WU, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by JUNG, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 128, No. 5: 1137-1145
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

ERRORS IN REPORTED DIETARY INTAKES

II. LONG-TERM RECALL1

MARION L. WU, ALICE S. WHITTEMORE and DEXTER L. JUNG

Reprint requests to Dr. Marion L. Wu, Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Health Research and Policy, Health Research and Policy Building, Stanford, CA 94305–5092

Inconsistent results among case-control studies of diet and cancer may reflect discrepancies between dietary reports based on current habits and actual intakes from the time of cancer initiation in the distant past. To examine the validity of reported past and current diet as measures of past diet, the authors queuried 873 men and women in three northern California communities about their diet 11 years earlier in 1972 and about their current diet in 1983. They used the same dietary history questionnaire that had been administered to the subjects in 1972. Retrospectively recalled and currently reported nutrient intakes and measures of body size were compared with original reports obtained in 1972. Mean values of recalled nutrient intakes agreed with mean values of intakes reported in 1972. The agreement held for each sex, community, and nutrient examined. By contrast, mean values of current intakes were smaller than those reported In 1972. Correlation coefficients showed closer agreement between recalled and original intakes than between current and original intakes. Nevertheless, recalled intakes correlated more closely with current intakes than with original ones. Analysis of variance was used to partition the variation in recalled and original intakes into components due to interpersonal variation in true intakes, errors in recall, and residual reporting error. Interpersonal variation accounted for only 20–40% of the variation in dietary intakes, with most of the balance due to reporting error. For comparison, interpersonal variation accounted for 70–85% of the variance of recalled and original reports of body size. These results suggest that inconsistencies among case-control studies of diet may be due to large random measurement errors in individual dietary intakes. The apparent validity and reproducibility of mean dietary measures, averaged over large populations, suggests the need for new designs for studies of diet and disease.

diet; epidemiologic methods; interviews; retrospective studies


1Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. E. Chavarro, B. A. Rosner, L. Sampson, C. Willey, P. Tocco, W. C. Willett, Wm. C. Chumlea, and K. B. Michels
Validity of Adolescent Diet Recall 48 Years Later
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 18, 2009; (2009) kwp299v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. H. Coker, R. H. Williams, S. E. Yeo, P. M. Kortebein, D. L. Bodenner, P. A. Kern, and W. J. Evans
The Impact of Exercise Training Compared to Caloric Restriction on Hepatic and Peripheral Insulin Resistance in Obesity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2009; 94(11): 4258 - 4266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. E. Chavarro, K. B. Michels, S. Isaq, B. A. Rosner, L. Sampson, C. Willey, P. Tocco, W. C. Willett, and W. C. Chumlea
Validity of Maternal Recall of Preschool Diet After 43 Years
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2009; 169(9): 1148 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. M. Moeller, R. Voland, L. Tinker, B. A. Blodi, M. L. Klein, K. M. Gehrs, E. J. Johnson, D. M. Snodderly, R. B. Wallace, R. J. Chappell, et al.
Associations Between Age-Related Nuclear Cataract and Lutein and Zeaxanthin in the Diet and Serum in the Carotenoids in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (CAREDS), an Ancillary Study of the Women's Health Initiative
Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 2008; 126(3): 354 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. M. Moeller, N. Parekh, L. Tinker, C. Ritenbaugh, B. Blodi, R. B. Wallace, J. A. Mares, and for the CAREDS Research Study Group
Associations Between Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Lutein and Zeaxanthin in the Carotenoids in Age-Related Eye Disease Study (CAREDS): Ancillary Study of the Women's Health Initiative.
Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2006; 124(8): 1151 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. S. Maruti, D. Feskanich, G. A. Colditz, A. L. Frazier, L. A. Sampson, K. B. Michels, D. J. Hunter, D. Spiegelman, and W. C. Willett
Adult Recall of Adolescent Diet: Reproducibility and Comparison with Maternal Reporting
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2005; 161(1): 89 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Brown, N. Kreiger, G. A. Darlington, and M. Sloan
Misclassification of Exposure: Coffee as a Surrogate for Caffeine Intake
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2001; 153(8): 815 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.