Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WINKLEBY, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by FISHER, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WINKLEBY, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by FISHER, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 128, No. 5: 1075-1083
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

HEIGHTENED RISK OF HYPERTENSION AMONG BLACK MALES: THE MASKING EFFECTS OF COVARIABLES

MARILYN A. WINKLEBY1,, DAVID R. RAGLAND2, S. LEONARD SYME2 and JUNE M. FISHER3

1Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA
2School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA
3Center for Occupational Safety and Health, San Francisco General Hospital San Francisco, CA

Reprint requests to Dr. Marilyn A. Winkleby, Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1000 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304–1885

This study examines the extent to which a set of 10 demographic, behavioral, and medical risk factors explain black/white differences in hypertension. Data are from a cross-sectional examination of San Francisco transit drivers aged 25–65 years surveyed during 1983–1985 as part of an occupational health study. The inherent restriction of the study population to bus drivers and the further restriction to males in this population (764 blacks and 224 whites) controlled for factors related to occupation and sex. Control of 10 additional potential risk factors, including age, education, body mass index, smoking, and intake of caffeine and alcohol was possible in the analytic phase of the study. The unadjusted prevalence of hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or current use of antihypertensive medications) was 36.1 per cent for black males compared with 30.8 per cent for white males. The greatest difference in prevalence was observed for black males aged 55–64 years, for whom the prevalence was 46 per cent higher than for white males the same age. Despite higher rates of hypertension, blacks in all age groups exhibited lower levels of most major risk factors for hypertension. As a result, the independent effect of race on hypertension was increased rather than attenuated when the 10 covarlables were taken into account (odds ratio of 1.27 in the unadjusted analysis, increasing to 1.54 in the adjusted, multivariate analysis). That this set of risk factors did not explain the higher rates of hypertension among blacks suggests that racial differences may arise from as yet unrecognized environmental and/or individual factors. The results also indicate that the association between race and blood pressure may have been underestimated in past studies that have relied on unadjusted analyses, in which negative confounding or masking effects of covariables have not been considered.

blacks; blood pressure; cross-sectional studies; hypertension; whites


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. L. Syme
Reducing Racial And Social-Class Inequalities In Health: The Need For A New Approach
Health Aff., March 1, 2008; 27(2): 456 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.