Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (98)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WINGO, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WINGO, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 128, No. 1: 206-217
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

THE EVALUATION OF THE DATA COLLECTION PROCESS FOR A MULTICENTER, POPULATION-BASED, CASE-CONTROL DESIGN

PHYLLIS A. WINGO1,, HOWARD W. ORY2, PETER M. LAYDE3, NANCY C. LEE1 and THE CANCER AND STEROID HORMONE STUDY GROUP 4

1Division of Reproductive Health, Center for Health Promotion and Education, Centers for Disease Control Atlanta, GA 30333
2Information Resources Management Office, Centers for Disease Control Atlanta, GA
3Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control Atlanta, GA

Send reprint requests to Ms. Phyllis A. Wingo at this address

This report details the methods the authors used to conduct the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, a multicenter, population-based, case-control study of oral contraceptive use in relation to breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer diagnosed during 1980–1982. The authors have documented their methods and rationale, and the results of their data collection efforts as a practical guide for the planning and conduct of large case-control studies. They observed the following: 1) the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program is a useful epidemiologic resource for identifying cases from which to evaluate risk factors for cancer in the United States; 2) random digit dialing is an effective and efficient method for screening for eligible controls for a population-based study; 3) with the cooperation of community pathologists, histologic specimen slides can be retrieved and reviewed for diagnostic confirmation and histologic subclassification of cancer for greater than 95% of the cases interviewed; and 4) data reported during personal interviews of study participants can be validated by reviewing medical records for more than 75% of study participants who reported medical events that occurred during the 10 years before the beginning of the study.

epidemiologic methods; interviews; prospective studies


4The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group: Principal Investigator, George L. Rubin; Project Director, Phyllis A. Wingo; Project Associates, Nancy C. Lee, Michele G. Mandel, and Herbert B. Peterson; Data Collection Centers Principal Investigators, Atlanta—Raymond Greenberg; Connecticut—J. Wister Meigs and W. Douglas Thompson; Detroit, Michigan—G. Marie Swanson; Iowa—Elaine Smith; New Mexico—Charles Key and Dorothy Pathak; San Francisco—Donald Austin; Seattle—David Thomas; Utah—Joseph Lyon and Dee West; Pathology Review Principal Investigators, Fred Gorstein, Robert Mc-Divitt, and Stanley J. Robboy; Project Consultants, Lonnie Burnett, Robert Hoover, Peter M. Layde, Howard W. Ory, James J. Schlesselman, David Schottenfeld, Bruce Stadel, Linda A. Webster, and Colin White; and Pathology Consultants, Walter Bauer, William Christopherson, Deborah Gersell, Robert Kurman, Allen Paris, and Frank Vellios.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski, G. L. Anderson, D. S. Lane, A. K. Aragaki, T. Rohan, S. Yasmeen, G. Sarto, C. A. Rosenberg, F. A. Hubbell, and For the Women's Health Initiative Investigators
Predicting Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women by Hormone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2007; 99(22): 1695 - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
P. A. Wingo, H. Austin, P. A. Marchbanks, M. K. Whiteman, J. Hsia, M. G. Mandel, H. B. Peterson, and H. W. Ory
Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Death From Breast Cancer
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2007; 110(4): 793 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. K. Whiteman, S. D. Hillis, K. M. Curtis, J. A. McDonald, P. A. Wingo, and P. A. Marchbanks
Body Mass and Mortality After Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2005; 14(8): 2009 - 2014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. K. Whiteman, S. D. Hillis, K. M. Curtis, J. A. McDonald, P. A. Wingo, and P. A. Marchbanks
Reproductive History and Mortality After Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2004; 104(1): 146 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. L. Glaser, C. A. Clarke, R. A. Nugent, C. B. Stearns, and R. F. Dorfman
Reproductive Factors in Hodgkin's Disease in Women
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2003; 158(6): 553 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
N. C. Briggs, H. I. Hall, E. A. Brann, C. J. Moriarty, and R. S. Levine
Cigarette Smoking and Risk of Hodgkin's Disease: A Population-based Case-Control Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2002; 156(11): 1011 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. A. Marchbanks, J. A. McDonald, H. G. Wilson, S. G. Folger, M. G. Mandel, J. R. Daling, L. Bernstein, K. E. Malone, G. Ursin, B. L. Strom, et al.
Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., June 27, 2002; 346(26): 2025 - 2032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. M. Schildkraut, B. Calingaert, P. A. Marchbanks, P. G. Moorman, and G. C. Rodriguez
Impact of Progestin and Estrogen Potency in Oral Contraceptives on Ovarian Cancer Risk
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 2, 2002; 94(1): 32 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M P. Madigan, R. Troisi, N. Potischman, D. Brogan, M. D Gammon, K. E Malone, and L. A Brinton
Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents from a case-control study of breast cancer in younger women
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2000; 29(5): 793 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
P. A. MARCHBANKS, H. WILSON, E. BASTOS, D. W. CRAMER, J. M. SCHILDKRAUT, and H. B. PETERSON
Cigarette Smoking and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer by Histologic Type
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2000; 95(2): 255 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. M. SCHILDKRAUT, S. HALABI, E. BASTOS, P. A. MARCHBANKS, J. A. MCDONALD, and A. BERCHUCK
Prognostic Factors in Early-Onset Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Population-Based Study
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2000; 95(1): 119 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. P. Costantino, M. H. Gail, D. Pee, S. Anderson, C. K. Redmond, J. Benichou, and H. S. Wieand
Validation Studies for Models Projecting the Risk of Invasive and Total Breast Cancer Incidence
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 15, 1999; 91(18): 1541 - 1548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. W. Bassett, V. P. Jackson, G. Cardenosa, D. B. Kopans, C. J. D'Orsi, M. N. Linver, P. J. Dempsey, E. B. Mendelson, D. D. Dershaw, B. Monsees, et al.
Risk of Risk-Based Mammography Screening, Ages 40 to 49
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 1999; 17(2): 730 - 730.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P Cumming, J L Stanford, J R Daling, N S Weiss, and B McKnight
Risk of breast cancer in relation to the interval since last full term pregnancy
BMJ, June 25, 1994; 308(6945): 1672 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.