Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (111)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KILBOURNE, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KILBOURNE, E. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 127, No. 6: 1210-1227
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

CHEMICAL CORRELATES OF PATHOGENICITY OF OILS RELATED TO THE TOXIC OIL SYNDROME EPIDEMIC IN SPAIN

EDWIN M. KILBOURNE1,, JOHN T. BERNERT, JR.1, MANUEL POSADA de la PAZ2, ROBERT H. HILL, JR.1, IGNACIO ABAITUA BORDA2, BARBARA W. KILBOURNE2, MATTHEW M. ZACK1 and THE TOXICO-EPIDEMJOLOGIC STUDY GROUP 3

1Center for Environmental Health and Injury Control, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333
2Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias de la Seguri-dad Social, Institute Nacional de la Salud, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Madrid, Spain

Reprint requests to Dr. Edwin M. Kilbourne

The identity of the etiologic agent that caused the 1981 epidemic of toxic oil syndrome in Spain has not been established, and toxicologic study of oil specimens from the outbreak has been hampered by uncertainty about which oils were actually capable of causing illness. To Identify chemical characteristics associated with pathogenicity, the authors compared specimens collected during the Spanish government's oil recall program in June and July 1981 from affected and unaffected households in the two contiguous towns of Alcorcon and Leganès (Madrid Province). Oils were blind-coded for laboratory analysis, and personnel with no knowledge of the laboratory results determined whether illness was present in a family. Contamination with free aniline and oleyl, linoleyl, and palmityl anilides was strikingly more frequent and extensive in oils collected from the case (affected) families. There was a clear-cut dose-response effect, with increasing concentrations of aniline and anilides associated with increasing risk of illness. Differences in fatty acid and sterol compositions among oils indicated more rapeseed oil admixture in the case group, but these indicators of rapeseed oil admixture did not contribute significantly to risk after the degree of aniline/ anilide contamination had been taken into account The authors conclude that the presence of relatively high levels of aniline and fatty acid anilides in oil specimens collected during the epidemic in the two towns studied indicates a high probability of the current or prior presence of the etiologic agent of toxic oil syndrome. Although these data do not necessarily indicate that any of the compounds measured actually caused the illness, further toxicologic work should concentrate on oils with substantial concentrations of the marker compounds.

anilides; aniline compounds; brassica; eosinophilia; hypertension; pulmonary; oils; pneumonia; scleroderma, systemic


3The Toxico-Epidemiologic Study Group: Juan Andrès Cereceda Perez, Francisco Diaz de Rojas, Ramon Fernàndez Pinilla, and Paz Garcia Montes- members of the former Comisiòn Unificada de Investigatiòn, Plan Nacional para el Sindrome Tòxico, Madrid, Spain; Gertrudis de la Fuente, Julio Nadal, Luis Soldevilla Benito, and Juan Manuel Tabuenca Oliver—Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias de la Seguridad Social, Institute National de la Salud, Min-isterio de Sanidad y Consumo, Madrid, Spain; Henry Falk, W. Harry Hannon, Larry L. Needham, Eric Sampson, and Wayman E. Turner—Center for Environmental Health and Injury Control, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
M. Posada
Foreword
Human and Experimental Toxicology, March 1, 2000; 19(3): 155 - 157.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
J. Varga and S. A. Jimenez
Chemical Exposure-Induced Cutaneous Fibrosis: Lessons From 'Experiments of Nature'
Arch Dermatol, January 1, 1994; 130(1): 97 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
R. Guitart, L. Norgaard, G. Mariani, M. Posada, I. Abaitua, E. Gelpi, and R. Fanelli
Analysis of Polychlorinated Dioxins and Furans in Samples of the Toxic Oil Syndrome
Human and Experimental Toxicology, January 1, 1993; 12(4): 273 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. Varga, J. Uitto, and S. A. Jimenez
The Cause and Pathogenesis of the Eosinophilia-Myalgia Syndrome
Ann Intern Med, January 15, 1992; 116(2): 140 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. C. Culpepper, R. G. Williams, P. J. Mease, T. D. Koepsell, and J. M. Kobayashi
Natural History of the Eosinophilia-Myalgia Syndrome
Ann Intern Med, September 15, 1991; 115(6): 437 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. N. James, M. L. Kamb, G. A. Sandberg, R. M. Silver, and E. M. Kilbourne
Postmortem Studies of the Heart in Three Fatal Cases of the Eosinophilia-Myalgia Syndrome
Ann Intern Med, July 15, 1991; 115(2): 102 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. A. Swygert, E. F. Maes, L. E. Sewell, L. Miller, H. Falk, and E. M. Kilbourne
Eosinophilia-Myalgia Syndrome: Results of National Surveillance
JAMA, October 3, 1990; 264(13): 1698 - 1703.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.