Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (58)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EDLAVITCH, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by BAXTER, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by EDLAVITCH, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by BAXTER, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 127, No. 6: 1164-1178
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

COMPARABILITY OF MORTALITY FOLLOW-UP BEFORE AND AFTER THE NATIONAL DEATH INDEX

STANLEY A. EDLAVITCH1, and JUDITH BAXTER1

1Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Stadium Gate 27, 611 Beacon St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455

Reprint requests to Dr. Stanley A. Edlavitch

Prior to 1979, epidemiologic studies which included mortality follow-up on large cohorts relied on death certificates from last state of residence and expensive follow-up techniques to determine survival. Beginning with 1979, the National Death Index can be used to search death certificate files from all 50 states, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. This paper addresses the issue of whether mortality follow-up in epidemiologic studies based on a single state death certificate search using only data available in 1970–1975 can be compared with post-1979 mortality follow-up using the National Death Index. This question was addressed by following a cohort of 2,925 coronary heart disease and cerebro-vascular disease 1980 hospital discharges from 1980 through 1983 with the use of both the National Death Index and the Minnesota Death Index (MINNDEX). Algorithms for evaluating potential death certificate matches were developed independently for both systems. The systems agreed on the survival status of 98% of the cohort, and both identified 31% as dead. This study supports the comparison of results of National Death Index follow-up to pre-National Death Index studies using algorithms such as the MINNDEX, and provides evidence that trend analyses relying on single state death searches pre-1979 and on the National Death Index from 1979 are valid, particularly in chronically ill persons.

death certificates; mortality; survival; vital statistics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Wu, A. P. Furnary, and G. L. Grunkemeier
Using the National Death Index to Validate the Noninformative Censoring Assumption of Survival Estimation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 85(4): 1256 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. G. McGovern, D. R. Jacobs Jr, E. Shahar, D. K. Arnett, A. R. Folsom, H. Blackburn, and R. V. Luepker
Trends in Acute Coronary Heart Disease Mortality, Morbidity, and Medical Care From 1985 Through 1997 : The Minnesota Heart Survey
Circulation, July 3, 2001; 104(1): 19 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. M. Lee, J. M. Karon, R. Selik, J. J. Neal, and P. L. Fleming
Survival After AIDS Diagnosis in Adolescents and Adults During the Treatment Era, United States, 1984-1997
JAMA, March 14, 2001; 285(10): 1308 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
H. D. Sesso, R. S. Paffenbarger, and I-M. Lee
Comparison of National Death Index and World Wide Web Death Searches
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2000; 152(2): 107 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. R. Jacobs Jr, C. Kroenke, R. Crow, M. Deshpande, D. F. Gu, L. Gatewood, and H. Blackburn
PREDICT: A Simple Risk Score for Clinical Severity and Long-Term Prognosis After Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina : The Minnesota Heart Survey
Circulation, August 10, 1999; 100(6): 599 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. G. McGovern, J. S. Pankow, E. Shahar, K. M. Doliszny, A. R. Folsom, H. Blackburn, R. V. Luepker, and The Minnesota Heart Survey Investigators
Recent Trends in Acute Coronary Heart Disease -- Mortality, Morbidity, Medical Care, and Risk Factors
N. Engl. J. Med., April 4, 1996; 334(14): 884 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Y. Liao, R. S. Cooper, D. L. McGee, G. A. Mensah, and J. K. Ghali
The Relative Effects of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, Coronary Artery Disease, and Ventricular Dysfunction on Survival Among Black Adults
JAMA, May 24, 1995; 273(20): 1592 - 1597.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Shahar, P. G. McGovern, J. M. Sprafka, J. S. Pankow, K. M. Doliszny, R. V. Luepker, and H. Blackburn
Improved Survival of Stroke PatientsDuring the 1980s : The Minnesota Stroke Survey
Stroke, January 1, 1995; 26(1): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. G. McGovern, G. L. Burke, J. M. Sprafka, S. Xue, A. R. Folsom, and H. Blackburn
Trends in Mortality, Morbidity, and Risk Factor Levels for Stroke From 1960 Through 1990: The Minnesota Heart Survey
JAMA, August 12, 1992; 268(6): 753 - 759.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. D. Bullock, R. J. Reed, and I. Grant
Reduced Mortality Risk in Alcoholics Who Achieve Long-term Abstinence
JAMA, February 5, 1992; 267(5): 668 - 672.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.