American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 127, No. 5: 981-989
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
research-article |
BREAST CANCER IN RELATION TO THE OCCURRENCE AND TIME OF INDUCED AND SPONTANEOUS ABORTION
1Slone Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine 1371 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA 02146
2Department of Medicine, Section of General Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, PA
3Epidemiology and Preventive Medical Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY
Reprint requests to Dr. Lynn Rosenberg
The authors evaluated whether an induced or spontaneous abortion during the first six months of gestation, particularly if it occurs before the first term pregnancy, increases the risk of breast cancer. Data from a case-control study of women under 70 years of age were used: 3,200 cases of breast cancer were compared with 4,844 controls with nonmalignant nongynecologic conditions. Among both nulliparous and parous women, the risk of breast cancer was not related to the number of induced or spontaneous abortions. After allowance for all identified potential confounding factors, the estimated relative risk for nulliparous women with an induced abortion relative to those who had never been pregnant was 1.3 (95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.82.2), and for spontaneous abortion, the corresponding estimate was 0.9 (95% Cl 0.51.5). Among parous women, the estimated relative risks were 1.2 (95% Cl 0.91.6) for an induced abortion and 0.9 (95% Cl 0.81.0) for a spontaneous abortion, relative to never having had an abortion of any type. The time of the abortion had little effect: The relative risk estimates were 0.9 (95% Cl 0.51.4) for induced abortion before the first term birth, 1.4 (95% Cl 1.01.9) for induced abortion first occurring after the first term birth, 0.9 (95% Cl 0.71.2) for spontaneous abortion before the first term birth, and 0.9 (95% Cl 0.71.0) for spontaneous abortion first occurring after the first term birth. Similar results were evident for women under age 40, among whom the frequency of induced abortion was relatively high. These data suggest that the risk of breast cancer is not materially affected by abortion, regardless of whether it occurs before or after the first term birth.
abortion; breast neoplasms
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Mahue-Giangreco, G. Ursin, J. Sullivan-Halley, and L. Bernstein Induced Abortion, Miscarriage, and Breast Cancer Risk of Young Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2003; 12(3): 209 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Melbye, J. Wohlfahrt, J. H. Olsen, M. Frisch, T. Westergaard, K. Helweg-Larsen, and P. K. Andersen Induced Abortion and the Risk of Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., January 9, 1997; 336(2): 81 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Newcomb, B. E. Storer, M. P. Longnecker, R. Mittendorf, E. R. Greenberg, and W. C. Willett Pregnancy Termination in Relation to Risk of Breast Cancer JAMA, January 24, 1996; 275(4): 283 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Gammon, J. E. Bertin, and M. B. Terry Abortion and the Risk of Breast Cancer: Is There a Believable Association? JAMA, January 24, 1996; 275(4): 321 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Colton, E. R. Greenberg, K. Noller, L. Resseguie, C. Van Bennekom, T. Heeren, and Y. Zhang Breast Cancer in Mothers Prescribed Diethylstilbestrol in Pregnancy: Further Follow-up JAMA, April 28, 1993; 269(16): 2096 - 2100. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


