Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MACLEAN, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MACLEAN, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 127, No. 3: 663-673
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

research-article

ASSESSING CHANGES IN RISK FACTOR EFFECT OVER MULTIPLE LEVELS OF SEVERITY

CHARLES J. MACLEAN1,

1Honolulu Heart Program, Kuakini Medical Center 347 North Kuakini Street, Honolulu, HI 96817

Send reprint requests to Dr. C. J. MacLean at this address

Use of the logistic function has become standard for regression of proportions onto risk factors, but where multiple levels of response are recorded, several different techniques are common. For most purposes, the "inclusive" method is most appropriate. However, if investigation is focused directly on the pattern of risk factor effects over levels of severity, the inclusive method is too conservative, because its overlapping categories tend to minimize any real differences among risk factor effects at separate levels. Several alternative techniques maximize these estimated differences, but interpretation of their results is much more sensitive to the assumed model than is estimation of category frequencies. In most cases, it is not possible to know precisely what model actually generated the data at hand. Therefore, a procedure is recommended which combines the safety of the inclusive method with an adjuvant technique called the "continuation ratio" method which has greater power to disclose differences between risk factor effects at different levels of response.

regression analysis; risk; statistics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.