Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DEAN, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by HALL, W. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DEAN, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by HALL, W. N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 127, No. 3: 654-662
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

research-article

ADJUSTING MORBIDITY RATIOS IN TWO COMMUNITIES USING RISK FACTOR PREVALENCE IN CASES1

ANDREW G. DEAN2,3, HARRIET H. IMREY4, KARI DUSICH3 and WILLIAM N. HALL5

2Division of Surveillance and Epidemiologic Studies, Epidemiology Program Office Bldg. 1, Room 5127, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333
3(Formerly) Division of Disease Prevention and Control, Minnesota Department of Health Minneapolis, MN
4Regional Health Resource Center Urbana, IL
5(Formerly) Centers for Disease Control Atlanta, GA

Available data on cancer incidence for 1969–1971 showed statistically elevated rates for breast cancer in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, a community with creosote contamination of the water supply, when compared with the rest of the Minneapolis-St Paul area taken as the reference population. In order to assess the effect of other known risk factors for breast cancer, 75 persons with breast cancer in each of the two populations were interviewed to obtain frequencies of known risk factors. An adjusted morbidity ratio in the two populations and an expected case rate in the exposed community were calculated from these frequencies, using relative risk values from the medical literature. The adjusted morbidity ratio was less than 1.0, and the observed rate was almost identical to the new expectation, although the age-adjusted rates alone had suggested a significant difference in incidence. This method makes use of relative risks from published studies rather than those associated with local cases and controls. It allows more refined evaluation of differences in cancer rates between communities than can be provided by age- and sex-specific calculations alone, and may allow use of available statistics in situations where cost, temporal considerations, or population size do not favor large new studies.

breast neoplasms; environmental exposure; epidemiologic methods; polycyclic hydrocarbons; statistics

1From the Division of Disease Prevention and Control, Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis, MN.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. M. Piper, W. A. Ray, J. R. Daugherty, and M. R. Griffin
Corticosteroid Use and Peptic Ulcer Disease: Role of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs
Ann Intern Med, May 1, 1991; 114(9): 735 - 740.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. R. Griffin, J. M. Piper, J. R. Daugherty, M. Snowden, and W. A. Ray
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use and Increased Risk for Peptic Ulcer Disease in Elderly Persons
Ann Intern Med, February 15, 1991; 114(4): 257 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. R. Griffin, W. A. Ray, and W. Schaffner
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use and Death from Peptic Ulcer in Elderly Persons
Ann Intern Med, September 1, 1988; 109(5): 359 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.