Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COOK, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by GOLDMAN, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COOK, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by GOLDMAN, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 127, No. 3: 626-639
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

research-article

ASYMMETRIC STRATIFICATION

AN OUTLINE FOR AN EFFICIENT METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CONFOUNDING IN COHORT STUDIES

E. FRANCIS COOK and LEE GOLDMAN

From the Division of General Medicine and the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

Reprint requests to Dr. E. Francis Cook, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115

Confounding is usually controlled by either cross-stratification or multivariate modeling. The first approach is simple and intuitive, but it is not practical for controlling many factors. The second approach, although less intuitive, may provide a more efficient means for controlling many confounders, but its ability to control confounding depends on the appropriateness of the chosen model. Hybrid methods based on a multivariate confounder score or a propensity score combine the favorable characteristics of both methods and may be better suited for controlling many confounders. However, the resulting strata are defined by subranges of a multivariate model, and, therefore, may possess little intrinsic meaning. The authors propose the principle of asymmetric stratification to control efficiently a number of confounders in cohort studies while retaining the intuitive appeal and general framework of cross-stratification. The proposed method resembles a propensity score analysis but does not use a multivariate model to define the strata. Instead, strata are defined by the categories of only a subset of the original potential confounders. The authors also demonstrate how our proposed method can be implemented by an application of classification and regression trees (CART) (recursive partitioning), as outlined by Breiman et al. (Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1984). Computer simulations and an actual example suggest that the proposed method is a potentially simpler alternative to the standard propensity score analysis. Specific recommendations on how the proposed method can be improved are also presented.

biometry; epidemiologic methods


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. N. Reddan, L. Szczech, M. V. Bhapkar, D. J. Moliterno, R. M. Califf, E. M. Ohman, P. B. Berger, J. S. Hochman, F. Van de Werf, R. A. Harrington, et al.
Renal function, concomitant medication use and outcomes following acute coronary syndromes
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2105 - 2112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. N. Reddan, L. A. Szczech, R. H. Tuttle, L. K. Shaw, R. H. Jones, S. J. Schwab, M. S. Smith, R. M. Califf, D. B. Mark, and W. F. Owen Jr.
Chronic Kidney Disease, Mortality, and Treatment Strategies among Patients with Clinically Significant Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2003; 14(9): 2373 - 2380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. S. Cepeda, R. Boston, J. T. Farrar, and B. L. Strom
Comparison of Logistic Regression versus Propensity Score When the Number of Events Is Low and There Are Multiple Confounders
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2003; 158(3): 280 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Fam MedHome page
J. L. Jackson, K. Kroenke, and J. Chamberlin
Effects of Physician Awareness of Symptom-Related Expectations and Mental Disorders: A Controlled Trial
Arch Fam Med, March 1, 1999; 8(2): 135 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
A. F. Connors Jr, T. Speroff, N. V. Dawson, C. Thomas, F. E. Harrell Jr, D. Wagner, N. Desbiens, L. Goldman, A. W. Wu, R. M. Califf, et al.
The Effectiveness of Right Heart Catheterization in the Initial Care of Critically III Patients
JAMA, September 18, 1996; 276(11): 889 - 897.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.