Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KAY, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by McCULLAGH, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KAY, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by McCULLAGH, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 125, No. 4: 690-705
Copyright © 1987 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

A MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR THE RURAL AMPLIFICATION OF MURRAY VALLEY ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS IN SOUTHERN AUSTRALIA

B. H. KAY1,, A. J. SAUL1 and A. McCULLAGH2

1Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brainston Terrace Herston, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia
2Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Queensland Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Reprint requests to Dr. B. H. Kay

The exacerbation of epidemics of Murray Valley encephalitis in southern Australia during 1951 and 1974 was studied retrospectively to determine when viral introduction may have occurred. Data from studies spanning over 30 years were utilized 1) to determine the number of infective Culex annulirostris necessary to cause one clinical case, based on known host-feeding patterns and the subclinical infection rate in man, and 2), using mathematical modeling, to calculate the likely duration of the rural amplification phase. Generalized tables were generated which demonstrated that mosquito longevity, extrinsic incubation period, and duration of the feeding cycle were the most important variables predisposing rapid amplification. Although Murray Valley encephalitis transmission may still occur during adverse conditions when the reproduction rate Z < 1.0, subtraction of the durations of incubation in man prior to clinical onset and the most likely rural amplification period from the dates of onset of clinical infections during January 1951 and 1974 suggested that amplification commenced around October 9–30 and that any Murray Valley encephalitis introduction had occurred by then. Examination of bird and mosquito dispersal prior to this time suggests that long-range dissemination of the virus from endemic northern Australia was unlikely.

Culex; encephalitis viruses; epidemiologic methods; models; theoretical


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.