Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (90)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COTTLER, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by SPITZNAGEL, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COTTLER, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by SPITZNAGEL, E. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 125, No. 2: 329-339
Copyright © 1987 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

DIFFICULT-TO-RECRUIT RESPONDENTS AND THEIR EFFECT ON PREVALENCE ESTIMATES IN AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEY

LINDA B. COTTLER1,, JOHN F. ZIPP2, LEE N. ROBINS1 and EDWARD L. SPITZNAGEL3,4

1Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO
2Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Milwaukee, WI
3Department of Mathematics, Washington University St. Louis, MO
4Department of Preventive Medicine, Divisions of Biostatistics and Health Care Research, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO

Reprint requests to Linda B. Cottler, Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 4940 Audubon Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110

Generous contact efforts were used to recruit 3,004 respondents into the first wave of the St. Louis Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) project, a psychiatric epidemiologic study of the general population, conducted from 1981–1982. These efforts were analyzed to establish which sociodemographic characteristics or current psychiatric disorders were determinants of difficulty in recruitment Being young, male, black, a nonrural resident, educated, and full-time employed were the demographic characteristics associated with increased contact efforts. Persons currently meeting criteria for an alcohol disorder required almost 20% more contact attempts than those without the disorder; this difficulty lay both in their being less available for an initial contact and refusing at a higher rate once contacted. An optimal recruitment effort cutoff point is provided, and a method is suggested for detecting that optimal point in the course of ongoing studies.

alcohol abuse; biometry; epidemiologic methods; health surveys; prevalence studies; psychiatry


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
G. A. KENNA and M. D. WOOD
The prevalence of alcohol, cigarette and illicit drug use and problems among dentists
J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2005; 136(7): 1023 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
P. Jousilahti, V. Salomaa, K. Kuulasmaa, M. Niemela, and E. Vartiainen
Total and cause specific mortality among participants and non-participants of population based health surveys: a comprehensive follow up of 54 372 Finnish men and women
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, April 1, 2005; 59(4): 310 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
H. Tolonen, U. Keil, M. Ferrario, A. Evans, and for the WHO MONICA Project
Prevalence, awareness and treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in 32 populations: results from the WHO MONICA Project
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 181 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Rogers, M. A. Murtaugh, S. Edwards, and M. L. Slattery
Contacting Controls: Are We Working Harder for Similar Response Rates, and Does It Make a Difference?
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2004; 160(1): 85 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Stang and K.-H. Jockel
Studies with Low Response Proportions May Be Less Biased than Studies with High Response Proportions
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2004; 159(2): 204 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
D W Cowling, T P Johnson, B C Holbrook, R B Warnecke, and H Tang
Improving the self reporting of tobacco use: results of a factorial experiment
Tob. Control, June 1, 2003; 12(2): 178 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
D M Purdie, M P Dunne, F M Boyle, M D Cook, and J M Najman
Health and demographic characteristics of respondents in an Australian national sexuality survey: comparison with population norms
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, October 1, 2002; 56(10): 748 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
J. Manjer, S. Elmstahl, L. Janzon, and G. Berglund
Invitation to a population-based cohort study: differences between subjects recruited using various strategies
Scand J Public Health, April 1, 2002; 30(2): 103 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. d. Graaf, R. V. Bijl, F. Smit, A. Ravelli, and W. A. M. Vollebergh
Psychiatric and Sociodemographic Predictors of Attrition in a Longitudinal Study The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS)
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2000; 152(11): 1039 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
S. Lapham, G. Baum, B. Skipper, and I. Chang
ATTRITION IN A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF DRIVING WHILE IMPAIRED OFFENDERS: WHO IS LOST?
Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2000; 35(5): 464 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
S. I. Woodruff, C. C. Edwards, and T. L. Conway
Enhancing Response Rates To a Smoking Survey for Enlisted U.S. Navy Women
Eval Rev, December 1, 1998; 22(6): 780 - 791.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.