Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHEAR, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by BERENSON, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHEAR, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by BERENSON, G. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 125, No. 1: 73-84
Copyright © 1987 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

DESIGNATION OF CHILDREN WITH HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE—CONSIDERATIONS ON PERCENTILE CUT POINTS AND SUBSEQUENT HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE: THE BOGALUSA HEART STUDY

CHARLES L. SHEAR1,2, GREGORY L. BURKE1,2, DAVLD S. FREEDMAN1,2, LARRY S. WEBBER3 and GERALD S. BERENSON1,

1Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Louisiana State University Medical Center New Orleans, LA
2Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Medical Center New Orleans, LA
3Department of Biometry and Genetics, Louisiana State University Medical Center New Orleans, LA.

Reprint requests to Dr. Gerald S. Berenson, National Research and Demonstration Center-Arteriosclerosis, Louisiana State University Medical Center,1542 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112-2822.

The effects of changing the percentile cut points of 1) prior blood pressure measurements (both single and serial examinations) on prediction of subsequent high Mood pressure, and of 2) the definition of subsequent high blood pressure were assessed in 1,501 children from Bogalusa, Louisiana. Subjects were 2–14 years old at initial examination (year 1, 1973–1974) and were reexamined three, five, and eight years after the Initial examination. Increasing the stringency of the prior measurement cut point resulted in increased specificity and positive predictive value, but decreased sensitivity and negative predictive value. For prediction of subsequent systolic blood pressure at the 90th percentile from year 1 levels, increasing the year 1 cut point from the 80th to the 95th percentile resulted in decreased sensitivity from 42.8 to 13.0%, and increased specificity from 83.0 to 97.3%. For systolic pressure, requiring all prior serial measurements to be above specified cut points resulted in further increases in specificity (maximizing at 100%) and decreases in sensitivity (minimizing at 2.1%). Using a year 1 cut point at the 90th percentile, increases in the definition of subsequent high blood pressure (from the 80th percentile to 140/90 mmHg or on treatment, respectively) resulted in increased sensitivity (from 20.5 to 33.3%) and negative predictive value, with decreasing specificity (from 93.9 to 91.3%) and positive predictive value. The results indicate that use of stringent criteria (serially at the 95th percentile) to identify children at risk for future essential hypertension will result in a substantial portion of the childhood population who will escape early identification but who will develop adult hypertension. Less stringent criteria will increase sensitivity and thereby provide the opportunity for primary prevention to a larger portion of the general childhood population who are at high risk for adult hypertension.

blood pressure; coronary disease; hypertension


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.