American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 124, No. 2: 317-328
Copyright © 1986 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
research-article |
A COMPARISON OF COSTS AND DATA QUALITY OF THREE HEALTH SURVEY METHODS: MAIL, TLEPHONE AND PERSONAL HOME INTERVIEW1
2 Reprint requests to Dr. Brian O'Toole, Sample Survey Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006 Australia
Three survey modes—a self-administered mailed questionnaire, a telephone interview, and a home interview—were assessed for survey costs, adequacy of completion, test-retest reliability, validity of responses to medical questions and estimates of morbidity. Costs per household for each mode were $A42.75, $A74.33, and $A71.89, respectively. Item omission was confined virtually to the mail mode and averaged 5.5% over 84 questions assessed, while telephone and home interview modes averaged 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively. "Don't knows" were virtually absent for all questions except those about precise details (names, places, etc.) of events occurring often 10–15 years before the survey; no mode differences were observed. The mail mode produced less reliable responses to questions about environmental exposure to hazardous chemicals or activities when considered question-by-question, but differences were not significant among modes when all questions were grouped. Reliability was high to medical questions and no mode differences were observed. Medical conditions which would require a medical diagnosis for subjects to be able to report them were more reliably answered than conditions described in broad or lay terms. Validity of answers to medical questions varied across modes and types of questions; underreporting of medical conditions was highest in the mail mode and was lowest for conditions requiring a diagnosis. Overreporting was lowest in the mail mode and highest for conditions requiring a diagnostic opinion.
health surveys; survey methods; questionnaires
1 From the Australian Veterans Health Studies, Commonwealth Institute of Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. J. Samelson, J. L. Kelsey, D. P. Kiel, A. M. Roman, L. A. Cupples, M. B. Freeman, R. N. Jones, M. T. Hannan, S. G. Leveille, M. M. Gagnon, et al. Issues in Conducting Epidemiologic Research Among Elders: Lessons From The MOBILIZE Boston Study Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2008; 168(12): 1444 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Haapea, J. Miettunen, E. Laara, M. I. Joukamaa, M.-R. Jarvelin, M. K. Isohanni, and J. M. Veijola Non-participation in a field survey with respect to psychiatric disorders Scand J Public Health, September 1, 2008; 36(7): 728 - 736. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Ihlebaek, S. Brage, and H. R. Eriksen Health complaints and sickness absence in Norway, 1996-2003 Occup. Med., January 1, 2007; 57(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. G. Edwards, J. A. Schwartzbaum, S. Lonn, A. Ahlbom, and M. Feychting Exposure to Loud Noise and Risk of Acoustic Neuroma Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2006; 163(4): 327 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. F. Harkness, G. J. Macfarlane, A. J. Silman, and J. McBeth Is musculoskeletal pain more common now than 40 years ago?: two population-based cross-sectional studies Rheumatology, July 1, 2005; 44(7): 890 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. E. Fries, M. James, S. S. Hammer, L. R. Shugarman, and J. N. Morris Is Telephone Screening Feasible? Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of Identifying People Medically Eligible for Home- and Community-Based Services Gerontologist, October 1, 2004; 44(5): 680 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Aitken, P. H. Youl, M. Janda, M. Elwood, I. T. Ring, and J. B. Lowe Comparability of Skin Screening Histories Obtained by Telephone Interviews and Mailed Questionnaires: A Randomized Crossover Study Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2004; 160(6): 598 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Riechelmann and G. Rettinger Three-Step Reconstruction of Complex Saddle Nose Deformities Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, March 1, 2004; 130(3): 334 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. C. Christensen, J. Schuz, M. Kosteljanetz, H. S. Poulsen, J. Thomsen, and C. Johansen Cellular Telephone Use and Risk of Acoustic Neuroma Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 159(3): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Brogger, P. Bakke, G. E. Eide, and A. Gulsvik Contribution of Follow-up of Nonresponders to Prevalence and Risk Estimates: A Norwegian Respiratory Health Survey Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2003; 157(6): 558 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Brogger, P. Bakke, G. E. Eide, and A. Gulsvik Comparison of Telephone and Postal Survey Modes on Respiratory Symptoms and Risk Factors Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2002; 155(6): 572 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. P. Kaplan, J. F. Hilton, S. Park-Tanjasiri, and E. J. PErez-Stable The Effect of Data Collection Mode on Smoking Attitudes and Behavior in Young African American and Women: Face-to-Face Interview Versus Self-Administered Questionnaires Eval Rev, August 1, 2001; 25(4): 454 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H S J Picavet National health surveys by mail or home interview: effects on response J Epidemiol Community Health, June 1, 2001; 55(6): 408 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Y. Martinez, C. A. C. Pereira, M. L. dos Santos, R. M. Ciconelli, S. M. Guimaraes, and J. A. B. Martinez Evaluation of the Short-Form 36-Item Questionnaire to Measure Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Chest, June 1, 2000; 117(6): 1627 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. A. Pruchno and J. M. Hayden Interview Modality: Effects on Costs and Data Quality in a Sample of Older Women J Aging Health, February 1, 2000; 12(1): 3 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-F. Etter and T. V Perneger Snowball sampling by mail: application to a survey of smokers in the general population Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2000; 29(1): 43 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Ketola and M. Klockars Computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) in primary care Fam. Pract., April 1, 1999; 16(2): 179 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.-M. Pietila, P. Rantakallio, and E. Laara Background Factors Predicting Non-Response in a Health Survey of Northern Finnish Young Men Scand J Public Health, June 1, 1995; 23(2): 129 - 136. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. G. Escobedo, R. F. Anda, P. F. Smith, P. L. Remington, and E. E. Mast Sociodemographic Characteristics of Cigarette Smoking Initiation in the United States: Implications for Smoking Prevention Policy JAMA, September 26, 1990; 264(12): 1550 - 1555. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Kasper, T. A. Wehr, J. J. Bartko, P. A. Gaist, and N. E. Rosenthal Epidemiological Findings of Seasonal Changes in Mood and Behavior: A Telephone Survey of Montgomery County, Maryland Arch Gen Psychiatry, September 1, 1989; 46(9): 823 - 833. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|