Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by POOLE, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by POOLE, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 123, No. 2: 352-358
Copyright © 1986 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

research-article

EXPOSURE OPPORTUNITY IN CASE-CONTROL STUDIES

CHARLES POOLE1,

1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA

Epidemiology Resources Inc., P. 0. Box 57, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 address for reprint requests

Efficient control of confounding is well recognized as a legitimate motive for restriction, matching, and conditional analysis in case-control studies. Some investigators, however, have advocated use of the same techniques for another purpose: to achieve a balance of "opportunity" or "potential" for past exposure between cases and controls. This paper shows that disparities of exposure opportunity between cases and controls exert no bias on estimates of the incidence rate ratio. The precision of rate ratio estimates is lessened when case-control studies are reduced in size by the exclusion of people with no opportunity for exposure. Matching and conditional analysis with respect to indicators of exposure opportunity also reduce precision without enhancing validity. Such indicators, which are correlates of exposure but not determinants of disease, are not confounders; therefore, they do not need to be controlled in the design or analysis of case-control studies.

biometry; epidemiologic methods; research design; retrospective studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. Suissa
Immeasurable Time Bias in Observational Studies of Drug Effects on Mortality
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2008; 168(3): 329 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. M. Bell, I. Hertz-Picciotto, and J. J. Beaumont
Case-Cohort Analysis of Agricultural Pesticide Applications near Maternal Residence and Selected Causes of Fetal Death
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2001; 154(8): 702 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
J. Sobieraj, D. B. Schembre, K. K. Boynton, A. P. Fishman, R. M. Hoffman, D. Upson, N. V. Dhurandhar, R. L. Atkinson, D. F. Williamson, L. Abenhaim, et al.
Appetite-Suppressant Drugs and Primary Pulmonary Hypertension
N. Engl. J. Med., February 13, 1997; 336(7): 510 - 513.
[Full Text]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.