Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (170)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KATAN, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by NOBELS, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KATAN, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by NOBELS, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 123, No. 2: 221-234
Copyright © 1986 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

EXISTENCE OF CONSISTENT HYPO- AND HYPERRESPONDERS TO DIETARY CHOLESTEROL IN MAN1

MARTIJN B. KATAN, ANTON C. BEYNEN 2, JEANNE H. M. DE VRIES and ANJA NOBELS

Reprint requests to Dr. Mar-tim B. Katan at this address

Hyper- and hyporesponsiveness of serum cholesterol to dietary cholesterol is an established concept in animals but not in man. The authors studied the stability of the individual response of serum cholesterol to dietary cholesterol in three controlled experiments in 1982. The subjects were volunteers from the general population living in or near Wageningen, the Netherlands. Each experiment had a low-cholesterol baseline period (121, 106, and 129 mg/day in experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively) and a high-cholesterol test period (625, 673, and 989 mg/day). Duplicate portion analysis showed that dietary cholesterol was the only variable. The 94 healthy men and women who completed experiment 1 showed an increase (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) in serum cholesterol of 0.50 ± 0.39 mmol/liter (19 ± 15 mg/dl). Seventeen putative hyperresponders, defined by their response in experiment 1, were retested in experiments 2 and 3; they showed responses of 0.28 ± 0.38 mmol/liter (11 ± 15 mg/dl) and 0.82 ± 0.35 mmol/liter (32 ± 14 mg/dl), respectively. Fifteen hyporesponders, selected in experiment 1, showed responses in experiments 2 and 3 of 0.06 ± 0.35 mmol/liter (2 ± 14 mg/dl) and 0.47 ± 0.26 mmol/liter (18 ± 10 mg/dl), significantly lower than the corresponding values for hyperresponders. The standardized regression coefficient for individual responses in experiment 2 on those in experiment 1 was ß = 0.34 (p = 0.03, n = 32); the corresponding regression coefficient for experiment 3 and experiment 1 was 0.53 (p < 0.01). After correction for intraindividual fluctuations the true responsiveness distribution was found to have a between-subject standard deviation of about 0.29 mmol/liter (11 mg/dl). This implies that if the mean response to a certain dietary cholesterol load amounts to e.g., 0.58 mmol/liter (22 mg/dl), then the 16% of subjects least susceptible to diet will experience a rise of only 0.29 mmol/liter (11 mg/dl) or less, while in the 16% of subjects most susceptible to diet, serum cholesterol will rise by 0.87 mmol/liter (34 mg/dl) or more. The authors conclude that modest differences in responsiveness of serum cholesterol to dietary cholesterol do exist in man, and that the wide scatter of responses observed in single experiments is largely due to chance fluctuations.

cholesterol, dietary; cholesterol; controlled clinical trial; egg yolk; individuality; lipoproteins, HDL


2Present address: Department of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Utrecht Utrecht, The Netherlands

1From the Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, De Dreijen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
C. E. O'Neil and T. A. Nicklas
State of the Art Reviews: Relationship Between Diet/ Physical Activity and Health
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, December 1, 2007; 1(6): 457 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. Wu, R. Bowman, A. A. Welch, R. N. Luben, N. Wareham, K.-T. Khaw, and S. A. Bingham
Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms, dietary fat and fibre, and serum lipids: the EPIC Norfolk study
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2007; 28(23): 2930 - 2936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. M. Clark, K. L. Herron, D. Waters, and M. L. Fernandez
Hypo- and Hyperresponse to Egg Cholesterol Predicts Plasma Lutein and {beta}-Carotene Concentrations in Men and Women
J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. M. Greene, T. L. Zern, R. J. Wood, S. Shrestha, D. Aggarwal, M. J. Sharman, J. S. Volek, and M. L. Fernandez
Maintenance of the LDL Cholesterol:HDL Cholesterol Ratio in an Elderly Population Given a Dietary Cholesterol Challenge
J. Nutr., December 1, 2005; 135(12): 2793 - 2798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. K. Hofman, R. M. Weggemans, P. L. Zock, E. G. Schouten, M. B. Katan, and H. M. G. Princen
CYP7A1 A-278C Polymorphism Affects the Response of Plasma Lipids after Dietary Cholesterol or Cafestol Interventions in Humans
J. Nutr., September 1, 2004; 134(9): 2200 - 2204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. A Pereira, R. M Weggemans, D. R Jacobs Jr, P. J Hannan, P. L Zock, J. M Ordovas, and M. B Katan
Within-person variation in serum lipids: implications for clinical trials
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 33(3): 534 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. F Masson, G. McNeill, and A. Avenell
Genetic variation and the lipid response to dietary intervention: a systematic review
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2003; 77(5): 1098 - 1111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
L. A. Woollett, D. D. Buckley, L. Yao, P. J. H. Jones, N. A. Granholm, E. A. Tolley, and J. E. Heubi
Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on cholesterol absorption and metabolism in humans
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 935 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. L. Herron, S. Vega-Lopez, K. Conde, T. Ramjiganesh, N. S. Shachter, and M. L. Fernandez
Men Classified as Hypo- or Hyperresponders to Dietary Cholesterol Feeding Exhibit Differences in Lipoprotein Metabolism
J. Nutr., April 1, 2003; 133(4): 1036 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
F. Cardona, F. J. Tinahones, E. Collantes, A. Escudero, E. Garcia-Fuentes, and F. J. Soriguer
The elevated prevalence of apolipoprotein E2 in patients with gout is associated with reduced renal excretion of urates
Rheumatology, March 1, 2003; 42(3): 468 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. M Weggemans, P. L Zock, and M. B Katan
Dietary cholesterol from eggs increases the ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in humans: a meta-analysis
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2001; 73(5): 885 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Q. Ye and P. O Kwiterovich Jr
Influence of genetic polymorphisms on responsiveness to dietary fat and cholesterol
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2000; 72 (5): 1275S - 1284S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
R. M. Weggemans, P. L. Zock, S. Meyboom, H. Funke, and M. B. Katan
Apolipoprotein A4-1/2 polymorphism and response of serum lipids to dietary cholesterol in humans
J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2000; 41(10): 1623 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
D. J. McNamara
The Impact of Egg Limitations on Coronary Heart Disease Risk: Do the Numbers Add Up?
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2000; 19(90005): 540S - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. T Gerhard, S. L Connor, R. C Wander, and W. E Connor
Plasma lipid and lipoprotein responsiveness to dietary fat and cholesterol in premenopausal African American and white women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2000; 72(1): 56 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. Mouzeyan, J. Choi, H. Allayee, X. Wang, J. Sinsheimer, J. Phan, L. W. Castellani, K. Reue, A. J. Lusis, and R. C. Davis
A locus conferring resistance to diet-induced hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis on mouse chromosome 2
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2000; 41(4): 573 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
E. Sehayek, C. Nath, T. Heinemann, M. McGee, C. E. Seidman, P. Samuel, and J. L. Breslow
U-shape relationship between change in dietary cholesterol absorption and plasma lipoprotein responsiveness and evidence for extreme interindividual variation in dietary cholesterol absorption in humans
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 1998; 39(12): 2415 - 2422.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
R. Carmena-Ramon, J. F. Ascaso, J. T. Real, J. M. Ordovas, and R. Carmena
Genetic Variation at the ApoA-IV Gene Locus and Response to Diet in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 1998; 18(8): 1266 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
H. Gylling, K. Kontula, U.-M. Koivisto, H. E. Miettinen, and T. A. Miettinen
Polymorphisms of the Genes Encoding Apoproteins A-I, B, C-III, and E and LDL Receptor, and Cholesterol and LDL Metabolism During Increased Cholesterol Intake: Common Alleles of the Apoprotein E Gene Show the Greatest Regulatory Impact
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 1997; 17(1): 38 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Ornish, S. E. Brown, B. A. Kottke, S. Shea, J. D. Barth, G. K. Bryan, J. E. Hokanson, M. A. Austin, H. N. Ginsberg, A. R. Tall, et al.
Treatment of and Screening for Hyperlipidemia
N. Engl. J. Med., October 7, 1993; 329(15): 1124 - 1128.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.