Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WEINBERG, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WEINBERG, C. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 123, No. 1: 162-173
Copyright © 1986 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

research-article

APPLICABILITY OF THE SIMPLE INDEPENDENT ACTION MODEL TO EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES INVOLVING TWO FACTORS AND A DICHOTOMOUS OUTCOME1

CLARICE RING WEINBERG

Reprint requests to Dr. Clarice R. Weinberg

In epidemiologic case-control studies and occupational cohort studies involving more than one exposure, it is sometimes of interest to investigate the possibility that two exposures or factors have an effect that is mutually enhancing. This paper begins with a simple classic model for independence of effect and describes how this model can be applied to cohort and case-control studies. A ratio index, borrowed from the toxicologic literature, can be used to quantify departures from this null model for prospective cohort studies. Models additive in log nonresponse are appropriate in this context. Proper stratification will remove confounding effects, although the possibility that covarying susceptibilities among individuals in the population are masking or producing the appearance of synergy remains. However, under a generalized null model that requires simple independent action for each individual, but allows the response probabilities to vary among individuals, the population-based ratio parameter may not be one but should lie in a specified interval. In a case-control setting, the simple independent action model implies that the ratio of the bivarlate exposure distribution for cases, divided by that for controls, should be additive in functions of the exposure levels, generalizing an earlier result. The index takes a different form when one of the factors is preventive rather than causal, and in this context, models additive in log risk become appropnate. An example is provided, and difficulties in interpretation are discussed.

biostatistics

1 Biometry and Risk Assessment Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P. O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin TrialsHome page
R. Allard and J.-F. Boivin
Using causal models to show the effect of untestable assumptions on effect estimates in randomized controlled trials
Clinical Trials, December 1, 2007; 4(6): 611 - 620.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Elbaz and A. Alperovitch
Bias in Association Studies Resulting from Gene-Environment Interactions and Competing Risks
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2002; 155(3): 265 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.