Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLAUGHLIN, J. K
Right arrow Articles by MANDEL, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLAUGHLIN, J. K
Right arrow Articles by MANDEL, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 122, No. 3: 485-494
Copyright © 1985 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

research-article

PROBLEMS IN THE USE OF DEAD CONTROLS IN CASE-CONTROL STUDIES

II. EFFECT OF EXCLUDING CERTAIN CAUSES OF DEATH

JOSEPH K McLAUGHLIN1,, WILLIAM J. BLOT2 and JACK S. MANDEL3

1Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Etiology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD
2Westat, Inc. Rockville, MD
3Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN

Reprint requests to Dr. Joseph K. McLaughlin, National Cancer Institute, Landow Building, Room 3C19, Bethesda, MD 20205

A recent comparison of 493 dead and 697 living controls from a case-control study of cancer in the Minneapolis-St Paul area showed that the dead controls of both sexes were reported to have been significantly heavier consumers of cigarettes, hard liquor, beer, and certain drugs, and to have had more adulthood diseases than living controls. The present analysis examines the effect of excluding causes of death associated with those exposures found in excess in the dead controls. Exclusion of individuals with smoklng-related causes of death reduced but did not eliminate the excess of cigarette smokers among the dead controls. Dotation of individuals with alcohol-related causes of death only slightly reduced the excess among dead controls. Adjustment for cigarette smoking, however, nearly eliminated the association with alcohol consumption, particularly among males. For certain adulthood diseases and medications, the exclusion of individuals with exposure-associated causes of death also virtually eliminated the excesses found in the dead controls when compared with the living controls. Thus, it appears that even after extensive exclusion of smoklng-related causes of death, the association between dead controls and cigarette smoking still remains, and the use of dead controls in case-control studies where cigarette smoking is the risk factor being evaluated may lead to a biased underestimate of risk. For the other exposures found in significant excess among the dead controls, the exclusion of exposure-related causes of death and proper adjustment for confounders may eliminate much or all of the excess.

epidemiologic methods; retrospective studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
P. Gustavsson, R. Jakobsson, F. Nyberg, G. Pershagen, L. Jarup, and P. Scheele
Occupational Exposure and Lung Cancer Risk: A Population-based Case-Referent Study in Sweden
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2000; 152(1): 32 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.