Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DEVESA, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by YOUNG, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DEVESA, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by YOUNG, J. L., JR.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 119, No. 2: 274-291
Copyright © 1984 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

other

ASSESSING THE VALIDITY OF OBSERVED CANCER INCIDENCE TRENDS1

SUSAN S. DEVESA, EARL S. POLLACK and JOHN L. YOUNG, JR.

Reprint requests to Dr. Devesa, Biometry Branch, NCI, Landow 5C19, Bethesda, MD 20205.

Devesa, S. S. (NCi, Bethesda, MD 20205), E. S. Pollack and J. L. Young, Jr. Assessing the validity of observed cancer incidence trends. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119: 274–91.

The available cancer incidence data from the National Cancer institute surveys, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, and the Connecticut Tumor Registry are examined for the period from the late 1940s to the present Two indicators of completeness and accuracy of reporting (percentage of cases reported only by death certificate and percentage of cases with histologic confirmation of the diagnosis) show considerable variation, particularly in the past, but no consistent strong patterns indicating noncom-parablllty of the data are apparent. incidence data for five geographic areas (Atlanta, Detroit, San Francisco-Oakland, lowa, and Connecticut) are examined for several primary sites by area and age, and are compared with mortality data for the same areas and the entire country. A variety of patterns in the trends are apparent. For several sites, the incidence trends are similar to what would be predicted based on the mortality patterns, but differences are apparent for other sites. Mortality trends may be influenced by shifts in diagnostic specificity on the death certificates and by changes in survival rates, and both incidence and mortality rates may be influenced by increased caseflnding, improvements in diagnostic procedures, expansion of the medical care delivery system, and real changes in the prevalence of risk factors. Therefore, both incidence and mortality data should be used when attempting to assess the real trends in cancer occurrence because sole reliance on one or the other may lead to erroneous conclusions.

epidemiologic methods; neoplasms

1From the Biometry Branch, National Cancer institute, Bethesda, MD.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ScienceHome page
B. N. AMES
In Reply: Cancer and Diet
Science, May 18, 1984; 224(4650): 668 - 760.
[PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.