| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 117, No. 5: 598-604
Copyright © 1983 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
research-article |
EFFECTS OF INTERACTION, CONFOUNDING AND OBSERVATIONAL ERROR ON ATTRIBUTABLE RISK ESTIMATION1
The properties of attributable risk are discussed for situations in which there are several risk factors that are possibly Interacting or confounded. Conditions are identified when the attributable risk among the exposed is constant, when the marginal attributable risk estimate is valid, and when the public health effects of separate risks are additive. Such conditions reflect, In various ways, the interaction and confounding of the different risk factors involved. For diseases with more than two risk factors, these conditions are sufficient but not necessary; thus it is possible to have additive public health effects of two risk factors even though they are confounded and interactive. In contrast, when there are exactly two binary risk factors, the conditions are sufficient and necessary. It is shown that bias in attributable risk through misclassification of exposure arises primarily through insensitivity errors. Particularly with zero false negative rates and equal false positive rates for cases and controls, the attributable risk estimate is unbiased; however, a larger standard error pertains to the estimate based on misclassified data.
biometry; epidemiologic methods; statistics
1From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada (address for reprints).
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. D. Nguyen, J. A. Eisman, J. R. Center, and T. V. Nguyen Risk Factors for Fracture in Nonosteoporotic Men and Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 955 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Tanuseputro, D. G. Manuel, S. E. Schultz, H. Johansen, and C. A. Mustard Improving Population Attributable Fraction Methods: Examining Smoking-attributable Mortality for 87 Geographic Regions in Canada Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2005; 161(8): 787 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Flegal, B. I. Graubard, and D. F. Williamson Methods of Calculating Deaths Attributable to Obesity Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2004; 160(4): 331 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. L. Bryant, S. M. Shetterly, J. Baxter, and R. F. Hamman Modifiable Risks of Incident Functional Dependence in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Elders: The San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study Gerontologist, October 1, 2002; 42(5): 690 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Benichou A review of adjusted estimators of attributable risk Statistical Methods in Medical Research, June 1, 2001; 10(3): 195 - 216. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. E. Eide, I. Heuch, and G. Albrektsen Re: Population Attributable Risk for Breast Cancer: Diet, Nutrition, and Physical Exercise J Natl Cancer Inst, May 17, 2000; 92(10): 843 - 844. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Wei, J. B. Kampert, C. E. Barlow, M. Z. Nichaman, L. W. Gibbons, R. S. Paffenbarger Jr, and S. N. Blair Relationship Between Low Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Mortality in Normal-Weight, Overweight, and Obese Men JAMA, October 27, 1999; 282(16): 1547 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|