Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JASON, J.
Right arrow Articles by TYLER, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JASON, J.
Right arrow Articles by TYLER, C. W., JR.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 117, No. 3: 309-319
Copyright © 1983 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

other

A COMPARISON OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY HOMICIDES IN THE UNITED STATES

JANINE JASON1,, LILO T. STRAUSS2 and CARL W. TYLER, JR.1

1Center for Health Promotion and Education CDC, Atlanta, GA 30333
2Family Planning Evaluation Division, Center for Health Promotion and Education CDC, Atlanta, GA 30333

Send reprint requests to: Dr. Janine Jason, Office of the Director, Center for Health Promotion and Education, CDC, Atlanta, GA 30333.

Jason, J. (CDC, Atlanta, GA 30333), L. T. Strauss and C. W. Tyler, Jr. A comparison of primary and secondary homicides in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 117: 309–19.

In 1979, over 20, 000 people in the United States were victims of homicide, but public health agencies have not yet defined their role in its prevention. Role definition might begin with differentiating various forms of homicide, so the authors used data on all homicides reported by law enforcement agencies for 1976–1979 to determine whether homicides that did not occur during the perpetration of another crime (primary homicides) differ from those that occurred during the perpetration of another crime (secondary homicides). Primary and secondary homicide rates were highest in the South and West, respectively. The relative risk for Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSAs) compared with non-SMSAs was 2.4 for secondary homicide but only 1.3 for primary homicide. It was found that 17% of primary homicides and 3% of secondary homicides had a female offender. Primary homicides were more frequently intersexual and intraracial than were secondary homicides. Victim and offender ages were similar to one another in primary homicides and dissimilar in secondary ones. Over 75% of primary homicides involved family members or acquaintances, compared to only 24% of secondary homicides. The authors conclude that primary and secondary homicides are epidemio-logically dissimilar, and they suggest that public health concern should focus on primary homicide. Prevention and intervention measures should concentrate on discussed target populations. Techniques might include stress reduction and conflict avoidance.

homicide; public health; violence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Homicide StudiesHome page
K. E. MORACCO, C. W. RUNYAN, and J. D. BUTTS
Femicide in North Carolina, 1991-1993: A Statewide Study of Patterns and Precursors
Homicide Studies, November 1, 1998; 2(4): 422 - 446.
[Abstract]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
P. M. Marzuk, K. Tardiff, and C. S. Hirsch
The Epidemiology of Murder-Suicide
JAMA, June 17, 1992; 267(23): 3179 - 3183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.