Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEE, J.
Right arrow Articles by KOLONEL, L. N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LEE, J.
Right arrow Articles by KOLONEL, L. N
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 115, No. 4: 515-525
Copyright © 1982 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

NUTRIENT INTAKES OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES: IMPLICATIONS FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH1

JAMES LEE and LAURENCE N KOLONEL

1Epidemiology Program, Cancer Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, 1236 Lauhala Street Honolulu, HI 96813

Reprint requests to Dr. James Lee

This study, conducted 1977–1979, was designed to assess the extent to which spouses share similar nutrient Intakes, and to determine whether con clusions based on spouse-substituted nutrient intake data in investigations of diet-disease associations could be misleading. The study sample consisted of 1428 married couples aged 45 years and older belonging to the five major ethnic groups (Caucasians, Japanese, Chinese, Filipinos and Hawailans/part Hawalians) residing on the island of Oahu, Hawaii. Caloric and nutrient data were derived from quantitative intake of 83 food and beverage items that had been selected to cover the main sources of dietary fat and protein (representing 85–90% of total intake), giving somewhat less complete information on carbohydrate and vitamins C and A. Statistical analyses were based on absolute nutrient consumption as well as on consumption per kilogram of body weight. As a group, hu8bands consumed substantially more calories, protein, fat, carbohydrate, cholesterol and vitamin A, but slightly less vitamin C than did the wives. Per unit of body weight, there was no noticeable husband-wife difference for any nutrient Item except vitamins A and C, which were consumed more by the wives. Within-spouse-pair analysis showed a moderate extent of husband-wife correlation In the consumption of each nu trient item, as measured by the intraciass correlation and Spearman's rank correlation. Whereas the intraciass correlations were generally higher when consumption was corrected for body weight, the reverse was true for the rank correlations. These resuits suggest that spouses exerted a moderate but definite mutual influence on dietary intake. However, linear regression analysis of the wives' consumption (dependent variable) on the husbands' consumption (independent variable) showed the regression coefficient to be substantially less than unity (p < 0.001) for all nutrient items, whether or not correction for body weight was made. Hence, the magnitude and even direction of the husband-wife difference in nutrient intake were not consistent among different couples (i.e., among the couples where the husband's intake was low, the wife tended to have a higher intake than the husband, and vice versa). These resuits Indicate that the use of nutrient Intake data substituted from one spouse as a reflection of the other may lead to erroneous conclusions. Ethnicity, age, socioeconomic level, and whether the marriage was ethnically homogeneous or mixed, did not materially affect the husband-wife relationship in nutrient intake. Also, the statistical results for those couples where one member (usually the wife) responded for the other spouse were not materially different from those couples where each member responded individually.

diet; epidemiologic methods; interviews; nutrition


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
H. H. Laroche, T. P. Hofer, and M. M. Davis
Adult Fat Intake Associated with the Presence of Children in Households: Findings from NHANES III
J Am Board Fam Med, January 1, 2007; 20(1): 9 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Collaku, T. Rankinen, T. Rice, A. S Leon, D. Rao, J. S Skinner, J. H Wilmore, and C. Bouchard
A genome-wide linkage scan for dietary energy and nutrient intakes: the Health, Risk Factors, Exercise Training, and Genetics (HERITAGE) Family Study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2004; 79(5): 881 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
I. De Bourdeaudhuij, J. Brug, C. Vandelanotte, and P. Van Oost
Differences in impact between a family- versus an individual-based tailored intervention to reduce fat intake
Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2002; 17(4): 435 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
I. De Bourdeaudhuij
Family Food Rules and Healthy Eating in Adolescents
J Health Psychol, January 1, 1997; 2(1): 45 - 56.
[Abstract]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
F. Chia, A.T. Ang, T.-W. Wong, K.W. Tan, K.-p. Fung, J. Lee, and K. Khin
Reliability of the Dinamap Non-invasive Monitor in the Measurement of Blood Pressure of III Asian Newborns
Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 1990; 29(5): 262 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.