Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LAIRD, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by STASON, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LAIRD, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by STASON, W. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 109, No. 4: 408-419
Copyright © 1979 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

SAMPLE-SIZE ESTIMATION: A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF A CLINICAL TRIAL FOR TREATMENT OF MILD HYPERTENSION1

NAN M. LAIRD, MILTON C. WEINSTEIN and WILLIAM B. STASON

Reprint requests to Dr. Laird.

The effectiveness of treatment for mild hypertension (diastolic pressures of 85 to 105 mm Hg) has not been conclusively demonstrated. Both the costs of a carefully designed clinical trial and the likelihood that It will produce definitive answers will depend importantly on the sample size. This paper presents sample-size estimates under a variety of assumptions regarding the characteristics of the population to the studied, the degree of blood pressure control to be achieved, and the health benefits to be expected. Under a central set of assumptions, the estimated sample size per group Is 22,700 with death as an endpoint and 14,000 with morbid events (CHD and stroke) as endpoints. As individual assumptions are varied one at a time, required sample sizes range from 10,900 to 101,100 and from 6800 to 63,100 for the respective endpoints. Results are most sensitive to the degree of blood pressure control actually achieved and to the expected health benefits from blood pressure control. They are also highly sensitive to the sex composition of the population and to expected dropout rates. The choice of sample size will depend on the decision maker's assessment of the likelihood that each assumption will be fulfilled and on the degree of willingness to risk an inconclusive study result. By making explicit the effect of variation in each assumption, decision making Is rendered more susceptible to critical examination by outside reviewers.

blood pressure; hypertension; prospective studies; research design; sampling studies; statistics


1 From the Center for the Analysis of Health Practices, Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA 02115


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.