Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CATES, W.
Right arrow Articles by DOLMAN, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CATES, W., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by DOLMAN, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 108, No. 3: 200-206
Copyright © 1978 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

other

ASSESSMENT OF SURVEILLANCE AND VITAL STATISTICS DATA FOR MONITORING ABORTION MORTALITY, UNITED STATES, 1972–1975

WILLARD CATES, Jr., JACK C. SMITH, ROGER W. ROCHAT, JOHN E. PATTERSON and ALICE DOLMAN

Family Planning Evaluation Division, Bureau of Epidemiology, Center for Disease Control Atlanta, GA 30333, and the National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD 20782

Send reprint requests to Dr. Willard Cates, Jr.Abortion Surveillance Branch, Family Planning Evaluation Division, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta,GA 30333

To assess the usefulness of vital statistics and surveillance for monitoring abortion mortality, the authors compared data from two systems of classification: 1) deaths classified according to the underlying cause by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) under the International Classification of Disease, Adapted (ICDA) code numbers 640–645 (abortion) for 1972–1975; and 2) abortion-related deaths reported to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) through Its epidemiologic surveillance of abortion mortality for the same years. Vital statistics classifications dealing with the underlying cause of death are based on criteria defined by ICDA guidelines applied to all available Information listed on death certificates, and exclude some deaths classified as abortion-related by CDC. Surveillance classifications are based on broader criteria developed by CDC from expanded data gathered by individual case investigation. Results showed that the surveillance techniques had Identified more deaths as abortion-related and had resolved more cases Into the specific abortion categories of legal, Illegal, and spontaneous than vital statistics tabulations based on death certificates. The authors estimate that the surveillance system alone reported 88% of all abortion-related deaths, the vital statistics system 52%, and the two systems combined a total of 94%. Inadequate physician documentation on the death certificate was the primary reason vital statistics data contained a smaller number of reported abortion deaths than surveillance data.

abortion; mortality; surveillance; vital statistics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
G. Corrao, V. Bagnardi, G. Vittadini, and S. Favilli
Capture-recapture methods to size alcohol related problems in a population
J Epidemiol Community Health, August 1, 2000; 54(8): 603 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical As, Y. D. Coble Jr, E. H. Estes Jr, C. A. Head, M. S. Karlan, W. R. Kennedy, P. J. Numann, W. C. Scott, W. D. Skelton, R. M. Steinhilber, et al.
Induced Termination of Pregnancy Before and After Roe v Wade: Trends in the Mortality and Morbidity of Women
JAMA, December 9, 1992; 268(22): 3231 - 3239.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
S. M. Berman, H. T. MacKay, D. A. Grimes, and N. J. Binkin
Deaths From Spontaneous Abortion in the United States
JAMA, June 7, 1985; 253(21): 3119 - 3123.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
W. Cates Jr, J. C. Smith, R. W. Rochat, and D. A. Grimes
Mortality From Abortion and Childbirth: Are the Statistics Biased?
JAMA, July 9, 1982; 248(2): 192 - 196.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.