Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HORWITZ, O.
Right arrow Articles by KJELDSEN, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HORWITZ, O.
Right arrow Articles by KJELDSEN, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 100, No. 2: 136-149
Copyright © 1974 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

THE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY OF MEASLES IN DENMARK1

OLE HORWITZ, KIRSTEN GRÜNFELD, BENT LYSGAARD-HANSEN and KJELD KJELDSEN

Horwitz, O. (Danish Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, 25 Svanemøllevej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark), K. Grünfeld, B. Lysgaard-Hansen and K. Kjeldsen. The epidemiology and natural history of measles in Denmark. Am J Epidemiol 100: 136–149, 1974.—From the national (central) population register for Denmark, a random sample of all children aged 0–14 years was drawn. A questionnaire was sent for each sampled child (a total of 6804 individuals); 6333 (93%) replied. According to the given information, 6126 children could be classified according to their measles (rubeola, morbilli) history; 207 could not be classified and were excluded from the analysis. Among the 6126 children, 612 contracted measles in 1972. The incidence among susceptible children (who had not previously had measles) increased from 100 per 1000 among the youngest to a peak 500 per 1000 among the 6-year-olds; thereafter the rate declined. The incidence was similar in urban areas and rural districts and among girls and boys up to 6 years of age. Girls older than 6 years had higher rates. The clinical course was explored through an interview by a specially trained public health nurse. Four hundred children who had measles in 1972 were selected; all but 13 were interviewed. The diagnosis was confirmed in 382 of the interviewed cases. The disease ran an uncomplicated course in 82%, while 18% of the children had one or two complications. Most frequent were infections of the respiratory system (7%), otitis media (9%) and other inflammatory conditions (3%); one child had encephalitis. The parents judged the course as severe in 28%, as medium in 46%, and as mild in 27%. Nearly half (45%) of the parents who were gainfully occupied outside the home were absent from work in order to care for the children; on the average, a case of measles means the loss of 1.3 man-days. Among the parents, 54% had positive attitudes towards measles vaccination, 30% were negative and 16% were undecided. The results of the sample were converted to a nationwide scale. Estimates are given of the annual number of cases (with or without complications), the number of requested medical visits, as well as the number of children who submitted to chemotherapy or were admitted to hospital.

epidemiology; public health; measles (rubeola, morbilli); sampling studies; vaccination


Danish Institute of Clinical Epidemiology (formerly the Danish Tuberculosis Index), 25 Svanemøllevej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
J. Christophersen
The Epidemiology of Scabies in Denmark, 1900 to 1975
Arch Dermatol, May 1, 1978; 114(5): 747 - 750.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
M. Ekblom, O. Elo, J. Laurinkari, and P. Niemela
Costs and Benefits of Measles Vaccination in Finland
Scand J Public Health, January 1, 1978; 6(3): 111 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.