Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCDONALD, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by WEST, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MCDONALD, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by WEST, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 100, No. 2: 130-135
Copyright © 1974 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES TO HERPESVIRUS TYPES 1 AND 2 IN CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX, CARCINOMA IN SITU AND CERVICAL DYSPLASIA1

A. D. MCDONALD, M. C. WILLIAMS 2, J. MANFREDA and R. WEST

McDonald, A. D. (Dept. Epidemiology and Health, McGill U., Montreal, Canada), M. C. Williams, J. Manfreda and R. West. Neutralizing antibodies to herpesvirus types 1 and 2 in carcinoma of the cervix, carcinoma in situ and cervical dysplasia. Am J Epidemiol 100: 130–135, 1974.—Neutralizing antibodies to herpesvirus types 1 and 2 were estimated by microneutralization in 57 women with invasive carcinoma of the cervix, 50 with carcinoma in situ, 39 with cervical dysplasia and equal numbers of matched controls. The ratio of type 2/type 1 herpesvirus neutralizing antibody was calculated and sera in which the ratio was 0.85 or more were called type 2. Among cases of invasive carcinoma and their controls, 20 cases (or 35%) and 12 controls (or 21%) were type 2. Hotelling's T2 test, taking into account differences in titer as well as in ratio, yielded a probability close to 0.16. For carcinoma in situ the proportions were 40.0% and 32.0% and for cervical dysplasia 30.8% and 38.4%. The controls who were from gynecological clinics had a higher prevalence of type 2 sera than women in the general population—a finding that merits investigation. The absence of a major difference in prevalence of sera type 2 in Jewish compared with non-Jewish women suggests that their different susceptibility to carcinoma of the cervix is not connected with herpesvirus experience. The findings of this survey were inconclusive.

carcinoma; cervix diseases; cervix uteri; Herpesvirus hominis


Present address: Pan American Health Organization, Trinidad Regional Virus Laboratory, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad

Department of Epidemiology and Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.